PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BITB vs. FBTC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BITB vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BITB vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
BITB
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF
-22.60%-6.47%99.10%
FBTC
Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust
-22.56%-6.56%99.56%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BITB having a -22.60% return and FBTC slightly higher at -22.56%.


BITB

1D
1.94%
1M
3.31%
YTD
-22.60%
6M
-40.84%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBTC

1D
1.97%
1M
3.29%
YTD
-22.56%
6M
-40.86%
1Y
-17.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BITB vs. FBTC - Expense Ratio Comparison

BITB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FBTC's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

BITB vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BITB
BITB Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
BITB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITB Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITB Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
BITB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITB Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

FBTC
FBTC Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FBTC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBTC Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBTC Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBTC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBTC Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BITB vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BITBFBTCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.40

-0.40

0.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.29

-0.29

0.00

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

0.97

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

-0.39

0.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.83

-0.84

0.00

BITB vs. FBTC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BITB Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is comparable to the FBTC Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BITB and FBTC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BITBFBTCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

-0.40

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.35

0.00

Correlation

The correlation between BITB and FBTC is 1.00, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BITB vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison

Neither BITB nor FBTC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BITB vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BITB drawdown since its inception was -49.38%, roughly equal to the maximum FBTC drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BITB and FBTC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BITBFBTCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.38%

-49.33%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.38%

-49.33%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.08%

-46.06%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.13%

-14.12%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.07%

23.05%

+0.02%

Volatility

BITB vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison

Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Trust (FBTC) have volatilities of 13.02% and 12.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BITBFBTCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.02%

12.97%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.81%

36.77%

+0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.28%

45.30%

-0.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.05%

51.21%

-0.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.05%

51.21%

-0.16%