BIP vs. QLD
BIP (Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P.) is a stock, while QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) is Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, BIP returned 12.92%/yr vs 33.87%/yr for QLD. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BIP vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIP achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 25.90% return. Over the past 10 years, BIP has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 12.92%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 33.87% annualized return.
BIP
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- 6M
- 17.39%
- YTD
- 17.70%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 9.23%
- 5Y*
- 6.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
QLD
- 1D
- -3.32%
- 1M
- -7.16%
- 6M
- 23.22%
- YTD
- 25.90%
- 1Y
- 48.13%
- 3Y*
- 37.48%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- 33.87%
BIP vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 17.70% | 15.15% | 6.40% | 6.64% | -20.73% | 27.77% | 15.45% | 51.38% | -19.15% | 39.72% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 25.90% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between BIP and QLD is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2008 | 0.35 |
The correlation between BIP and QLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BIP vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
BIP
QLD
BIP vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BIP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.23 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.92 | +0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.16 | 6.24 | -0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BIP vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIP drawdown since its inception was -56.07%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIP and QLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.07% | -83.13% | +27.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.25% | -25.13% | +12.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.90% | -42.29% | +2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.85% | -63.68% | +13.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -63.68% | +12.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.84% | +11.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -18.11% | +7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.76% | 7.73% | -2.97% |
Volatility
BIP vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. (BIP) is 6.43%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 14.98%. This indicates that BIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BIP | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.43% | 14.98% | -8.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.54% | 30.86% | -15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.94% | 37.22% | -17.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 45.59% | -18.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.97% | 44.86% | -16.89% |
Dividends
BIP vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
BIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIP Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.P. | 6.47% | 4.95% | 5.10% | 4.86% | 4.65% | 3.35% | 3.92% | 4.02% | 5.44% | 3.88% | 4.62% | 5.59% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BIP and QLD have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLD has higher volatility (14.98%) compared to BIP (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIP dropped -56.07% vs QLD's -83.13%.
BIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BIP and QLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer