BINT vs. WBIF

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BINT (Bluemonte Global Equity ETF) and WBIF (WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, BINT returned 27.48% vs 23.44% for WBIF. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BINT charges 0.23%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for WBIF.

Performance

BINT vs. WBIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BINT having a 13.21% return and WBIF slightly higher at 13.26%.

BINT

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.06%
• YTD: 13.21%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 27.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WBIF

• 1D: 0.34%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 13.26%
• 6M: 11.57%
• 1Y: 23.44%
• 3Y*: 8.53%
• 5Y*: 3.00%
• 10Y*: 5.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BINT vs. WBIF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	13.21%	14.43%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	13.26%	10.72%

Correlation

The correlation between BINT and WBIF is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.68

The correlation between BINT and WBIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

BINT vs. WBIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BINT	WBIF
Technology	27.6%	34.6%
Financial Services	18.1%	21.9%
Industrials	13.4%	10.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	15.5%
Healthcare	7.2%	4.3%
Communication Services	6.2%	1.8%
Basic Materials	5.5%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	4.7%	2.1%
Energy	4.2%	0.7%
Utilities	2.6%	2.0%
Real Estate	2.1%	-

Return for Risk

BINT vs. WBIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BINT

BINT Risk / Return Rank: 61
BINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
BINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Omega Ratio Rank: 63
BINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
BINT Martin Ratio Rank: 65

WBIF

WBIF Risk / Return Rank: 71
WBIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
WBIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
WBIF Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WBIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
WBIF Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BINT vs. WBIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) and WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BINT	WBIF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.89	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	2.72	-0.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.34	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	3.57	-1.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.28	12.65	-2.36

BINT vs. WBIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the WBIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BINT and WBIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BINT vs. WBIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BINT drawdown since its inception was -10.94%, smaller than the maximum WBIF drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BINT and WBIF.

Drawdown Indicators

	BINT	WBIF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.94%	-20.29%	+9.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.94%	-6.60%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-20.29%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	-0.66%	-2.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.51%	-7.70%	+6.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.68%	1.86%	+0.82%

Volatility

BINT vs. WBIF - Volatility Comparison

Bluemonte Global Equity ETF (BINT) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF (WBIF) at 4.64%. This indicates that BINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WBIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BINT	WBIF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.20%	4.64%	+2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.75%	9.10%	+4.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.76%	12.50%	+3.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.73%	12.90%	+2.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.73%	12.36%	+3.37%

BINT vs. WBIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BINT has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIF's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

BINT vs. WBIF - Dividend Comparison

BINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than WBIF's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BINT Bluemonte Global Equity ETF	1.01%	1.08%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
WBIF WBI BullBear Value 3000 ETF	0.06%	0.14%	1.17%	0.82%	0.96%	2.59%	0.09%	1.04%	0.77%	0.75%	0.67%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BINT and WBIF in my portfolio?

BINT and WBIF have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BINT or WBIF?

BINT has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to WBIF (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BINT dropped -10.94% vs WBIF's -20.29%.

Which ETF is better, BINT or WBIF?

On 1-year performance, BINT leads with 27.48% vs 23.44% for WBIF. On fees, BINT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, WBIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BINT or WBIF?

Over the 1-year period, BINT has performed better with a 27.48% return vs 23.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BINT or WBIF?

BINT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for WBIF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BINT or WBIF?

BINT has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.06% for WBIF.

What is the main difference between BINT and WBIF?

They also come from different issuers: Bluemonte and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for BINT and 1.25% for WBIF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WBIF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.