BIMPX vs. FFANX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BIMPX (BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX returned 6.88%/yr vs 6.88%/yr for FFANX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIMPX charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.

Performance

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 6.38% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: BIMPX at 6.88% and FFANX at 6.88%.

BIMPX

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 5.99%
• 6M: 5.36%
• 1Y: 14.22%
• 3Y*: 10.03%
• 5Y*: 4.44%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

FFANX

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.40%
• YTD: 6.38%
• 6M: 6.02%
• 1Y: 14.49%
• 3Y*: 10.91%
• 5Y*: 5.08%
• 10Y*: 6.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund	5.99%	13.43%	4.93%	12.41%	-14.84%	3.51%	19.76%	16.65%	-3.77%	11.77%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	6.38%	13.16%	7.40%	11.52%	-13.62%	8.03%	13.10%	15.81%	-4.06%	11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and FFANX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007	0.93

The correlation between BIMPX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMPX

BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 61
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 63

FFANX

FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIMPX	FFANX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	2.15	-0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.06	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.42	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	2.95	-0.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.36	12.54	-1.18

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and FFANX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIMPX	FFANX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.37%	-31.69%	-7.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.74%	-5.20%	-0.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.11%	-7.55%	-3.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.85%	-18.52%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.85%	-18.52%	-1.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-1.13%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.77%	-3.79%	-0.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	1.22%	+0.11%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) have volatilities of 3.17% and 3.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIMPX	FFANX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.17%	3.12%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.51%	6.09%	+0.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.51%	7.15%	+0.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.27%	7.95%	+1.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.60%	7.73%	+0.87%

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIMPX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than FFANX's 3.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIMPX BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund	5.36%	5.68%	0.00%	2.96%	3.06%	6.35%	4.34%	2.66%	7.95%	2.50%	1.83%	9.76%
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund	3.69%	3.97%	2.81%	2.49%	5.75%	2.35%	2.36%	3.67%	4.56%	2.56%	1.43%	3.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIMPX and FFANX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, BIMPX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BIMPX or FFANX?

BIMPX has higher volatility (3.17%) compared to FFANX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.