PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFANX vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFANX vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFANX achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FFANX has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 6.87%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.77% annualized return.


FFANX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.73%
YTD
7.52%
6M
8.05%
1Y
17.63%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
5.55%
10Y*
6.87%

SCHD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.70%
YTD
19.01%
6M
18.63%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
15.09%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
12.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFANX vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.52%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
19.01%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FFANX and SCHD is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2011

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between FFANX and SCHD has dropped to 0.37 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FFANX vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFANX
SCHD

Technology

26.1%
16.4%

Financial Services

16.5%
9.3%

Industrials

13.2%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
6.3%

Healthcare

8.9%
18.8%

Communication Services

7.8%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
19.2%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.2%

Energy

3.8%
16.2%

Utilities

2.6%
0.0%

Real Estate

2.3%

-

Technology

FFANX
26.1%
SCHD
16.4%

Financial Services

FFANX
16.5%
SCHD
9.3%

Industrials

FFANX
13.2%
SCHD
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

FFANX
9.3%
SCHD
6.3%

Healthcare

FFANX
8.9%
SCHD
18.8%

Communication Services

FFANX
7.8%
SCHD
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

FFANX
5.0%
SCHD
19.2%

Basic Materials

FFANX
4.5%
SCHD
1.2%

Energy

FFANX
3.8%
SCHD
16.2%

Utilities

FFANX
2.6%
SCHD
0.0%

Real Estate

FFANX
2.3%
SCHD

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFANX vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFANX vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFANXSCHDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.71

2.49

+0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.93

3.87

+0.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.45

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

5.91

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.00

14.53

+0.47

FFANX vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFANX Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFANX and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFANXSCHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.49

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.58

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.77

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.86

-0.18

Drawdowns

FFANX vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFANX drawdown since its inception was -31.69%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFANX and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFANXSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.69%

-33.37%

+1.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.20%

-4.61%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.55%

-16.13%

+8.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.52%

-16.85%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.52%

-33.37%

+14.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.40%

+1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-3.32%

-0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

1.88%

-0.69%

Volatility

FFANX vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) is 2.28%, while Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that FFANX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFANXSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.28%

2.66%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.45%

7.66%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.60%

10.96%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.86%

14.38%

-6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.70%

16.72%

-9.02%

FFANX vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFANX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFANX vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

FFANX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than SCHD's 3.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.26%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFANX and SCHD have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHD has higher volatility (2.66%) compared to FFANX (2.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFANX dropped -31.69% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFANX and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer