PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIMPX vs. FAMRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIMPX achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than FAMRX's 11.83% return. Over the past 10 years, BIMPX has underperformed FAMRX with an annualized return of 6.88%, while FAMRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


BIMPX

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.62%
YTD
5.99%
6M
5.36%
1Y
14.22%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
4.44%
10Y*
6.88%

FAMRX

1D
-2.05%
1M
0.33%
YTD
11.83%
6M
11.15%
1Y
25.61%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
11.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.99%13.43%4.93%12.41%-14.84%3.51%19.76%16.65%-3.77%11.77%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
11.83%20.87%12.60%18.98%-18.55%17.10%19.37%26.26%-9.21%21.08%

Correlation

The correlation between BIMPX and FAMRX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2006

0.92

The correlation between BIMPX and FAMRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BIMPX vs. FAMRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIMPX
BIMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BIMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
BIMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

FAMRX
FAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BIMPXFAMRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.38

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.65

2.91

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.36

12.61

-1.24

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIMPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the FAMRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIMPX and FAMRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIMPX drawdown since its inception was -39.37%, smaller than the maximum FAMRX drawdown of -58.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIMPX and FAMRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BIMPXFAMRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.37%

-58.65%

+19.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.74%

-9.33%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.11%

-15.35%

+4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.85%

-26.00%

+6.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.85%

-30.96%

+11.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.09%

-2.11%

+1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-12.30%

+7.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.15%

-0.82%

Volatility

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund (BIMPX) is 3.17%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund (FAMRX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that BIMPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAMRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BIMPXFAMRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

5.78%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.51%

11.16%

-4.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.51%

13.28%

-5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.27%

14.81%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

15.29%

-6.69%

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIMPX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than FAMRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

BIMPX vs. FAMRX - Dividend Comparison

BIMPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.36%, more than FAMRX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIMPX
BlackRock 40/60 Target Allocation Fund
5.36%5.68%0.00%2.96%3.06%6.35%4.34%2.66%7.95%2.50%1.83%9.76%
FAMRX
Fidelity Asset Manager 85% Fund
4.97%5.56%3.44%1.33%5.07%3.15%1.99%5.52%5.62%2.31%0.28%4.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BIMPX and FAMRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FAMRX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to BIMPX (3.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIMPX dropped -39.37% vs FAMRX's -58.65%.

FAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BIMPX and FAMRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer