BILT vs. TLT
BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Infrastructure Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while TLT is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. BILT is actively managed, while TLT is passively managed. Over the past year, BILT returned 17.98% vs -2.45% for TLT. Their 0.23 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for TLT.
Performance
BILT vs. TLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 14.30% return, which is significantly higher than TLT's -3.49% return.
BILT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -1.05%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 14.30%
- 1Y
- 17.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.07%
TLT
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- 6M
- -3.46%
- YTD
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -2.45%
- 3Y*
- -1.80%
- 5Y*
- -8.18%
- 10Y*
- -2.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.47%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.38M | $1.70M | $1.65M | |
| $2.33B | $2.02B | $2.19B |
BILT vs. TLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 14.30% | 4.16% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | -3.49% | 2.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and TLT is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. TLT — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
TLT
BILT vs. TLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 0.99 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | -0.14 | +3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.60 | -0.30 | +10.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILT vs. TLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum TLT drawdown of -48.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and TLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -48.35% | +42.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.38% | -7.74% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -43.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -42.36% | +40.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.36% | -13.99% | +12.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.78% | 3.57% | -1.79% |
Volatility
BILT vs. TLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) at 2.46%. This indicates that BILT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | TLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.10% | 2.46% | +0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.44% | 6.85% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.31% | 9.32% | +0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 15.74% | -5.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.31% | 14.83% | -4.52% |
BILT vs. TLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TLT's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILT vs. TLT - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.70%, more than TLT's 4.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.70% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | 4.34% | 4.43% | 4.30% | 3.38% | 2.67% | 1.50% | 1.50% | 2.27% | 2.63% | 2.43% | 2.60% | 2.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILT and TLT have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BILT has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to TLT (2.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILT dropped -5.38% vs TLT's -48.35%.
On 1-year performance, BILT leads with 17.98% vs -2.45% for TLT. On fees, TLT is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BILT has performed better with a 17.98% return vs -2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TLT is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.70%, compared with 4.34% for TLT.
BILT is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while TLT is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.15% for TLT.
BILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILT and TLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer