BILT vs. ZAP
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP).
BILT and ZAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BILT is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Jul 29, 2025. ZAP is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Global X U.S. Electrification Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2024.
Performance
BILT vs. ZAP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BILT vs. ZAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 11.38% | 3.99% |
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 10.67% | 2.97% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 11.38% return, which is significantly higher than ZAP's 10.67% return.
BILT
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- 11.38%
- 6M
- 12.22%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZAP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -3.57%
- YTD
- 10.67%
- 6M
- 9.86%
- 1Y
- 33.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILT vs. ZAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. ZAP — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
ZAP
BILT vs. ZAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and Global X U.S. Electrification ETF (ZAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILT | ZAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.07 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.66 | 1.69 | +0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and ZAP is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BILT vs. ZAP - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than ZAP's 1.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 1.34% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
ZAP Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | 1.64% | 1.81% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BILT vs. ZAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum ZAP drawdown of -12.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and ZAP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | ZAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -12.38% | +7.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.01% | -3.71% | +0.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.39% | -2.67% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility
BILT vs. ZAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | ZAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.77% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.37% | 16.07% | -6.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 16.55% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.37% | 16.55% | -7.18% |