BILT vs. SMHX
BILT (iShares Infrastructure Active ETF) and SMHX (VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BILT is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while SMHX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed Fabless Semiconductor Index. BILT is actively managed, while SMHX is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. BILT charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMHX.
Performance
BILT vs. SMHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILT achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMHX's 45.81% return.
BILT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- 6M
- 12.90%
- YTD
- 15.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SMHX
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- -11.84%
- 6M
- 39.57%
- YTD
- 45.81%
- 1Y
- 69.38%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BILT vs. SMHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 15.55% | 4.16% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 45.81% | 9.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILT and SMHX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILT vs. SMHX — Risk / Return Rank
BILT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SMHX
BILT vs. SMHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Infrastructure Active ETF (BILT) and VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF (SMHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILT | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.81 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.85 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILT vs. SMHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILT drawdown since its inception was -5.38%, smaller than the maximum SMHX drawdown of -38.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILT and SMHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILT | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.38% | -38.53% | +33.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.45% | -18.29% | +17.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -7.50% | +6.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.07% | — |
Volatility
BILT vs. SMHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILT | SMHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.19% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.30% | 38.52% | -28.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 41.81% | -31.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 41.81% | -31.51% |
BILT vs. SMHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILT has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMHX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILT vs. SMHX - Dividend Comparison
BILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than SMHX's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BILT iShares Infrastructure Active ETF | 5.64% | 0.99% | 0.00% |
SMHX VanEck Fabless Semiconductor ETF | 0.02% | 0.02% | 0.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILT and SMHX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SMHX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SMHX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for BILT.
BILT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.02% for SMHX.
BILT is categorized as Utilities Equities, while SMHX is Semiconductors. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for BILT and 0.35% for SMHX.
Find the right allocation for BILT and SMHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer