PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILDX vs. DBCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than DBCMX's 29.36% return.


BILDX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.86%
6M
0.80%
1Y
5.90%
3Y*
6.02%
5Y*
1.79%
10Y*

DBCMX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
29.36%
6M
30.72%
1Y
37.84%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
9.83%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
0.86%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%5.66%
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
29.36%6.10%0.45%-3.96%13.40%31.24%-6.07%4.78%-10.65%9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between BILDX and DBCMX is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

-0.08

The correlation between BILDX and DBCMX shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to -0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILDX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

DBCMX
DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BILDXDBCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.73

7.09

-4.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.86

26.68

-17.83

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.96, which is lower than the DBCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILDX and DBCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BILDXDBCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.96

2.84

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.60

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.53

+0.21

Drawdowns

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum DBCMX drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and DBCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXDBCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-37.62%

+21.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-5.48%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-14.75%

+11.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-27.60%

+11.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-3.51%

+2.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-13.27%

+10.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

1.45%

-0.77%

Volatility

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 0.97%, while DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a volatility of 5.92%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILDXDBCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

5.92%

-4.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.20%

12.23%

-10.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.09%

13.71%

-10.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

16.33%

-11.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

14.64%

-10.55%

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILDX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison

BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than DBCMX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.94%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%0.00%
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
2.35%3.04%2.89%3.30%46.88%13.53%0.00%1.04%1.21%5.23%0.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILDX and DBCMX have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBCMX has higher volatility (5.92%) compared to BILDX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs DBCMX's -37.62%.

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILDX and DBCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer