BILDX vs. DFAPX
Compare and contrast key facts about DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX).
BILDX is managed by DoubleLine. It was launched on Apr 1, 2016. DFAPX is managed by Dimensional. It was launched on Mar 7, 2011.
Performance
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | -0.28% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio | -0.34% | 7.22% | 1.81% | 6.84% | -12.92% | -1.57% | 9.19% | 9.97% | -0.24% | 3.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a -0.28% return, which is significantly higher than DFAPX's -0.34% return.
BILDX
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.80%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 4.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.73%
- 10Y*
- —
DFAPX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -0.34%
- 6M
- 0.41%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 4.07%
- 5Y*
- 0.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAPX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BILDX vs. DFAPX — Risk / Return Rank
BILDX
DFAPX
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BILDX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.98 | +0.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.41 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 1.81 | +0.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.29 | 5.33 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BILDX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.98 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.48 | +0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between BILDX and DFAPX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Dividend Comparison
BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, more than DFAPX's 3.78% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.44% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFAPX DFA Investment Grade Portfolio | 3.78% | 3.78% | 3.79% | 3.31% | 2.62% | 3.31% | 2.14% | 2.59% | 2.67% | 2.21% | 2.12% | 2.45% |
Drawdowns
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum DFAPX drawdown of -18.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and DFAPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILDX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -18.30% | +2.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.43% | -2.61% | +0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -18.22% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.80% | -2.17% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.03% | -3.50% | +0.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | 0.89% | -0.17% |
Volatility
BILDX vs. DFAPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 1.35%, while DFA Investment Grade Portfolio (DFAPX) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BILDX | DFAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 1.57% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 2.52% | -0.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 4.34% | -0.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 5.80% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.11% | 4.88% | -0.77% |