PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DBCMX vs. VCMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly higher than VCMDX's 13.42% return.


DBCMX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-7.14%
YTD
20.78%
6M
21.71%
1Y
25.98%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
6.39%

VCMDX

1D
-0.77%
1M
-7.67%
YTD
13.42%
6M
12.34%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
20.78%6.10%0.45%-3.96%13.40%31.24%-6.07%2.14%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
13.42%18.20%5.27%-7.45%13.83%34.82%5.07%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between DBCMX and VCMDX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.76

The correlation between DBCMX and VCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DBCMX vs. VCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DBCMX
DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VCMDX
VCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DBCMXVCMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

1.84

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.34

7.27

+4.07

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DBCMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the VCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DBCMX and VCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, which is greater than VCMDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and VCMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DBCMXVCMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.62%

-26.67%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.92%

-10.85%

+0.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.75%

-10.85%

-3.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.60%

-25.45%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.92%

-10.85%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.23%

-10.83%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.20%

2.89%

-0.69%

Volatility

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) at 3.51%. This indicates that DBCMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DBCMXVCMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

3.51%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

12.85%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.01%

15.06%

-1.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.28%

15.84%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.64%

15.37%

-0.73%

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than VCMDX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

DBCMX vs. VCMDX - Dividend Comparison

DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than VCMDX's 13.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DBCMX
DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund
2.51%3.04%2.89%3.30%46.88%13.53%0.00%1.04%1.21%5.23%0.51%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
13.41%15.21%2.19%2.50%14.21%30.56%0.50%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DBCMX and VCMDX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DBCMX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to VCMDX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBCMX dropped -37.62% vs VCMDX's -26.67%.

DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DBCMX and VCMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer