BILDX vs. AOK
BILDX (DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund) and AOK (iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF) are both funds - BILDX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by DoubleLine, while AOK is a Diversified Portfolio fund tracking the S&P Target Risk Conservative Index. Over the past 5 years, BILDX returned 1.71%/yr vs 3.59%/yr for AOK. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BILDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOK.
Performance
BILDX vs. AOK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than AOK's 3.83% return.
BILDX
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.75%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 4.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.98%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- —
AOK
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 3.39%
- 1Y
- 11.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.03%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 5.20%
BILDX vs. AOK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 0.75% | 7.59% | 4.41% | 8.89% | -11.54% | 0.14% | 5.48% | 8.30% | 0.39% | 5.66% |
AOK iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.83% | 11.26% | 6.58% | 10.85% | -14.16% | 4.87% | 9.33% | 13.90% | -3.09% | 9.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between BILDX and AOK is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, BILDX and AOK have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BILDX vs. AOK — Risk / Return Rank
BILDX
AOK
BILDX vs. AOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BILDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.27 | 2.46 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 10.37 | -3.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BILDX vs. AOK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum AOK drawdown of -18.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and AOK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BILDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.68% | -18.94% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.21% | -4.50% | +2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.31% | -6.37% | +3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -18.94% | +3.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.82% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.98% | -2.36% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.70% | 1.07% | -0.37% |
Volatility
BILDX vs. AOK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 0.94%, while iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF (AOK) has a volatility of 2.25%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BILDX | AOK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 2.25% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.28% | 4.85% | -2.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.08% | 6.01% | -2.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 7.15% | -2.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.09% | 6.72% | -2.63% |
BILDX vs. AOK - Expense Ratio Comparison
BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than AOK's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
BILDX vs. AOK - Dividend Comparison
BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than AOK's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOK iShares Core 30/70 Conservative Allocation ETF | 3.29% | 3.28% | 3.23% | 2.93% | 2.25% | 1.55% | 2.10% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.91% | 2.14% | 2.02% |
BILDX DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund | 4.94% | 4.64% | 4.11% | 3.42% | 3.31% | 3.45% | 2.89% | 3.40% | 3.18% | 3.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BILDX and AOK have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AOK has higher volatility (2.25%) compared to BILDX (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs AOK's -18.94%.
AOK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BILDX and AOK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer