PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILDX vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILDX vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 22.09% return.


BILDX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.74%
6M
-0.07%
YTD
0.42%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
5.77%
5Y*
1.39%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.93%

XLK

1D
-0.22%
1M
-2.90%
6M
22.17%
YTD
22.09%
1Y
37.14%
3Y*
26.04%
5Y*
18.87%
10Y*
23.77%
ALL TIME*
10.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$1.61B$1.67B$2.22B

BILDX vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
0.42%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%5.66%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.09%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between BILDX and XLK is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.05

The correlation between BILDX and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILDX vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BILDX vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILDXXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.58

2.16

-0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.74

5.85

-1.11

BILDX vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is comparable to the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILDX and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILDX vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-82.05%

+66.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-15.92%

+13.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.14%

-25.66%

+22.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.60%

-33.56%

+17.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-11.43%

+10.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.96%

-34.80%

+31.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.73%

5.86%

-5.13%

Volatility

BILDX vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) is 0.84%, while State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a volatility of 9.58%. This indicates that BILDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILDXXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

9.58%

-8.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.39%

21.81%

-19.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

25.59%

-22.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.43%

25.75%

-21.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.08%

24.90%

-20.82%

BILDX vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILDX vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.56%, more than XLK's 0.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.56%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.45%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILDX and XLK have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (9.58%) compared to BILDX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs XLK's -82.05%.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILDX and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer