DBCMX vs. PDBC
DBCMX (DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX returned 6.39%/yr vs 7.59%/yr for PDBC. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DBCMX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DBCMX achieves a 20.78% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 22.11% return. Over the past 10 years, DBCMX has underperformed PDBC with an annualized return of 6.39%, while PDBC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.59% annualized return.
DBCMX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 20.78%
- 6M
- 21.71%
- 1Y
- 25.98%
- 3Y*
- 9.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 6.39%
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.10%
- 1M
- -11.10%
- YTD
- 22.11%
- 6M
- 20.75%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.03%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- 7.59%
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 20.78% | 6.10% | 0.45% | -3.96% | 13.40% | 31.24% | -6.07% | 4.78% | -10.65% | 9.17% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 22.11% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DBCMX and PDBC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.78 |
The correlation between DBCMX and PDBC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DBCMX vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
DBCMX
PDBC
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DBCMX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.24 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.76 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.34 | 7.71 | +3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DBCMX drawdown since its inception was -37.62%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DBCMX and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DBCMX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.62% | -49.52% | +11.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -14.44% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.75% | -14.44% | -0.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.60% | -27.63% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.62% | -40.73% | +3.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.92% | -14.44% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.23% | -23.14% | +9.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 3.31% | -1.11% |
Volatility
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) is 3.96%, while Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that DBCMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DBCMX | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.96% | 4.42% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.48% | 16.20% | -3.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.01% | 18.73% | -4.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 19.15% | -2.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.77% | -3.13% |
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DBCMX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
DBCMX vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
DBCMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.51%, less than PDBC's 3.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund | 2.51% | 3.04% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 46.88% | 13.53% | 0.00% | 1.04% | 1.21% | 5.23% | 0.51% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.14% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DBCMX and PDBC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to DBCMX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DBCMX dropped -37.62% vs PDBC's -49.52%.
DBCMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DBCMX and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer