PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BILDX vs. AMFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BILDX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than AMFIX's 0.18% return.


BILDX

1D
-0.32%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.75%
6M
0.90%
1Y
4.78%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*

AMFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.32%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
0.75%7.59%4.41%8.89%-11.54%0.14%5.48%8.30%0.39%0.34%
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.18%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between BILDX and AMFIX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2017

0.79

The correlation between BILDX and AMFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BILDX vs. AMFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILDX
BILDX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
BILDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BILDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BILDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
BILDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
BILDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) and AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BILDXAMFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.97

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.15

9.10

-1.95

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BILDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the AMFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BILDX and AMFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BILDX drawdown since its inception was -15.68%, which is greater than AMFIX's maximum drawdown of -9.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BILDX and AMFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BILDXAMFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-9.35%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.21%

-0.74%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.31%

-0.88%

-2.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.68%

-8.91%

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-0.52%

-0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.98%

-2.01%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

0.24%

+0.46%

Volatility

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Volatility Comparison

DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund (BILDX) has a higher volatility of 0.94% compared to AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) at 0.46%. This indicates that BILDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BILDXAMFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

0.46%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

0.92%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

1.12%

+1.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.42%

2.17%

+2.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

1.74%

+2.35%

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BILDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than AMFIX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

BILDX vs. AMFIX - Dividend Comparison

BILDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%, more than AMFIX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.22%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
BILDX
DoubleLine Infrastructure Income Fund
4.94%4.64%4.11%3.42%3.31%3.45%2.89%3.40%3.18%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


BILDX and AMFIX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BILDX has higher volatility (0.94%) compared to AMFIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BILDX dropped -15.68% vs AMFIX's -9.35%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BILDX and AMFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer