PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMFIX vs. GUGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMFIX achieves a 0.18% return, which is significantly lower than GUGAX's 0.96% return.


AMFIX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.18%
6M
0.32%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
3.27%
5Y*
0.76%
10Y*

GUGAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.96%
6M
1.07%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-0.52%
10Y*
1.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.18%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%2.47%0.89%-0.44%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
0.96%7.29%0.96%6.02%-14.52%-3.17%4.91%9.66%2.13%0.08%

Correlation

The correlation between AMFIX and GUGAX is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2017

0.74

Over the past year, the correlation between AMFIX and GUGAX has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.74, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMFIX vs. GUGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

GUGAX
GUGAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GUGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GUGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) and GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMFIXGUGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.45

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.97

4.82

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.10

14.23

-5.13

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the GUGAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMFIX and GUGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum GUGAX drawdown of -38.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFIX and GUGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMFIXGUGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-38.57%

+29.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.74%

-1.16%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-6.12%

+5.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.91%

-20.53%

+11.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-6.72%

+6.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-11.26%

+9.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

0.39%

-0.15%

Volatility

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Volatility Comparison

AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund (GUGAX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AMFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMFIXGUGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

0.00%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

1.30%

-0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12%

2.80%

-1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

6.57%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.74%

5.42%

-3.68%

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMFIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than GUGAX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMFIX vs. GUGAX - Dividend Comparison

AMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, less than GUGAX's 4.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.22%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%0.00%0.00%
GUGAX
GMO Multi-Sector Fixed Income Fund
4.52%3.69%4.34%0.00%1.94%2.90%7.96%5.74%5.08%2.43%3.29%1.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMFIX and GUGAX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMFIX has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to GUGAX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFIX dropped -9.35% vs GUGAX's -38.57%.

GUGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMFIX and GUGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer