PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMFIX vs. MCFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMFIX achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly higher than MCFIX's -0.99% return.


AMFIX

1D
0.12%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.30%
6M
0.40%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
3.32%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*

MCFIX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.57%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
0.30%3.74%3.48%3.84%-6.26%-1.37%2.24%1.72%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
-0.99%6.64%2.02%6.47%-13.69%-1.05%4.75%3.31%

Correlation

The correlation between AMFIX and MCFIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2019

0.79

The correlation between AMFIX and MCFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMFIX vs. MCFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMFIX
AMFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
AMFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AMFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

MCFIX
MCFIX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
MCFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
MCFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) and Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMFIXMCFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.12

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.76

+2.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

1.98

+7.91

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is higher than the MCFIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMFIX and MCFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMFIX drawdown since its inception was -9.35%, smaller than the maximum MCFIX drawdown of -21.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFIX and MCFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMFIXMCFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.35%

-21.68%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.74%

-3.75%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.88%

-6.32%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.91%

-18.72%

+9.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-5.97%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-8.52%

+6.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

1.37%

-1.13%

Volatility

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AAMA Income Fund (AMFIX) is 0.46%, while Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund (MCFIX) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that AMFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MCFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMFIXMCFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.46%

1.10%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.91%

2.77%

-1.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.11%

4.03%

-2.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.17%

6.04%

-3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.74%

6.10%

-4.36%

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMFIX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than MCFIX's 0.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMFIX vs. MCFIX - Dividend Comparison

AMFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than MCFIX's 4.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMFIX
AAMA Income Fund
2.21%2.08%2.44%1.70%0.83%0.57%0.83%1.24%1.24%0.40%
MCFIX
Mercer Core Fixed Income Fund
4.31%3.89%4.54%3.68%3.31%2.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMFIX and MCFIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MCFIX has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to AMFIX (0.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMFIX dropped -9.35% vs MCFIX's -21.68%.

AMFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMFIX and MCFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer