BIDD vs. EFAS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BIDD (iShares International Dividend Active ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. BIDD is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, BIDD returned 25.22% vs 27.04% for EFAS. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIDD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for EFAS.

Performance

BIDD vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BIDD having a 13.11% return and EFAS slightly lower at 12.64%.

BIDD

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 3.75%
• YTD: 13.11%
• 6M: 14.10%
• 1Y: 25.22%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EFAS

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -2.54%
• YTD: 12.64%
• 6M: 13.56%
• 1Y: 27.04%
• 3Y*: 24.87%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIDD vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	13.11%	20.17%	-1.39%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	12.64%	46.83%	-1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between BIDD and EFAS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	0.55

The correlation between BIDD and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

BIDD vs. EFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIDD	EFAS
Financial Services	24.9%	31.0%
Technology	24.8%	0.1%
Industrials	16.0%	10.4%
Communication Services	6.9%	8.6%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	1.9%
Basic Materials	5.9%	1.7%
Healthcare	5.6%	0.1%
Energy	4.5%	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	8.1%
Real Estate	-	11.4%
Utilities	-	13.7%

Return for Risk

BIDD vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIDD

BIDD Risk / Return Rank: 46
BIDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
BIDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
BIDD Omega Ratio Rank: 46
BIDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BIDD Martin Ratio Rank: 47

EFAS

EFAS Risk / Return Rank: 80
EFAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
EFAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
EFAS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
EFAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
EFAS Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIDD vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BIDD	EFAS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	2.48	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.49	-1.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.43	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	5.13	-3.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.61	13.24	-5.63

BIDD vs. EFAS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIDD Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the EFAS Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIDD and EFAS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BIDD vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIDD drawdown since its inception was -15.08%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIDD and EFAS.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIDD	EFAS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.08%	-44.38%	+29.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.32%	-5.30%	-7.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.84%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.81%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.29%	+3.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.24%	-7.05%	+4.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.32%	2.05%	+1.27%

Volatility

BIDD vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Dividend Active ETF (BIDD) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 3.56%. This indicates that BIDD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIDD	EFAS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.26%	3.56%	+2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.84%	8.69%	+5.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.07%	10.96%	+5.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.20%	15.59%	+1.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.20%	18.31%	-1.11%

BIDD vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIDD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EFAS's 0.56% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIDD vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison

BIDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.54%, more than EFAS's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BIDD iShares International Dividend Active ETF	7.54%	2.74%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF	4.74%	4.83%	6.76%	6.33%	7.28%	5.19%	4.34%	5.75%	6.63%	6.15%	0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIDD and EFAS in my portfolio?

BIDD and EFAS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BIDD or EFAS?

BIDD has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to EFAS (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIDD dropped -15.08% vs EFAS's -44.38%.

Which ETF is better, BIDD or EFAS?

On 1-year performance, EFAS leads with 27.04% vs 25.22% for BIDD. On fees, EFAS is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BIDD or EFAS?

Over the 1-year period, EFAS has performed better with a 27.04% return vs 25.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIDD or EFAS?

EFAS is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BIDD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIDD or EFAS?

BIDD has the higher dividend yield at 7.54%, compared with 4.74% for EFAS.

What is the main difference between BIDD and EFAS?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for BIDD and 0.56% for EFAS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.