BICSX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BICSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Oct 2, 2011. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BICSX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BICSX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 19.23% | 28.70% | 4.38% | -4.32% | 11.90% | 22.44% | 6.80% | 11.60% | -14.50% | 8.28% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BICSX achieves a 19.23% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BICSX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.38%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
BICSX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 19.23%
- 6M
- 26.56%
- 1Y
- 40.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 14.24%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BICSX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BICSX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BICSX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BICSX
FASGX
BICSX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BICSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.54 | 1.21 | +1.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.22 | 1.73 | +1.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.26 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.87 | 1.55 | +2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.67 | 6.89 | +12.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BICSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.54 | 1.21 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.53 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.70 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.60 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between BICSX and FASGX is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
BICSX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BICSX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio | 2.59% | 3.09% | 3.60% | 9.39% | 9.05% | 2.68% | 0.80% | 2.03% | 2.12% | 0.65% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BICSX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BICSX drawdown since its inception was -51.59%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICSX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BICSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.59% | -47.35% | -4.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -9.07% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.35% | -23.54% | +1.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.82% | -27.20% | -8.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.36% | -7.95% | +6.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.75% | -6.74% | -14.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.04% | +0.03% |
Volatility
BICSX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 4.48% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BICSX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 4.57% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.47% | 7.78% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.34% | 12.82% | +3.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.83% | 12.14% | +3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.12% | 12.56% | +2.56% |