PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BICSX vs. VWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BICSX vs. VWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BICSX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 14.05% return. Over the past 10 years, BICSX has underperformed VWO with an annualized return of 8.46%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.31% annualized return.


BICSX

1D
-1.35%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
12.85%
6M
12.31%
1Y
27.44%
3Y*
14.22%
5Y*
11.56%
10Y*
8.46%

VWO

1D
0.77%
1M
3.96%
YTD
14.05%
6M
14.71%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
18.64%
5Y*
5.90%
10Y*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BICSX vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
12.85%28.70%4.38%-4.32%11.90%22.44%6.80%11.60%-14.50%8.28%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
14.05%25.60%10.59%9.25%-17.98%1.26%15.17%20.75%-14.76%31.49%

Correlation

The correlation between BICSX and VWO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2011

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between BICSX and VWO has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BICSX vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BICSX
BICSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
BICSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BICSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
BICSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BICSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
BICSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

VWO
VWO Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
VWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWO Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWO Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BICSX vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BICSXVWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.36

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.89

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.49

10.19

+2.30

BICSX vs. VWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BICSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is comparable to the VWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BICSX and VWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BICSX vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BICSX drawdown since its inception was -51.59%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BICSX and VWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BICSXVWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.59%

-67.68%

+16.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-11.17%

+2.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.53%

-17.37%

+6.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.35%

-32.60%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.82%

-36.39%

+0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.82%

0.00%

-8.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.47%

-15.79%

-4.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

3.16%

-0.98%

Volatility

BICSX vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio (BICSX) is 3.96%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that BICSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BICSXVWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

6.57%

-2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

14.28%

-2.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

16.67%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

17.53%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

19.24%

-4.20%

BICSX vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BICSX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

BICSX vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison

BICSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, more than VWO's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BICSX
BlackRock Commodity Strategies Portfolio
2.74%3.09%3.60%9.39%9.05%2.68%0.80%2.03%2.12%0.65%0.94%0.00%
VWO
Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF
2.26%2.79%3.20%3.52%4.11%2.63%1.91%3.23%2.88%2.30%2.52%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


BICSX and VWO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VWO has higher volatility (6.57%) compared to BICSX (3.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BICSX dropped -51.59% vs VWO's -67.68%.

VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BICSX and VWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer