BIBL vs. MEME

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BIBL is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BIBL charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.

Performance

BIBL vs. MEME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 58.71% return.

BIBL

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 6M: 18.49%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: —

MEME

• 1D: -12.84%
• 1M: 1.23%
• YTD: 58.71%
• 6M: 39.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBL vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	20.10%	0.21%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	58.71%	-36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and MEME is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.58

BIBL vs. MEME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BIBL	MEME
Technology	30.1%	58.8%
Industrials	26.8%	29.9%
Real Estate	14.7%	-
Financial Services	8.3%	5.7%
Energy	6.9%	4.8%
Healthcare	4.3%	5.4%
Basic Materials	4.2%	4.6%
Utilities	3.5%	10.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	-
Communication Services	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

BIBL vs. MEME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 77
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIBL	MEME	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.09	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.09	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIBL	MEME	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.01	+0.60

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and MEME.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIBL	MEME	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.12%	-48.78%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.85%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.23%	-16.61%	+13.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.04%	-29.66%	+22.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BIBL	MEME	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.82%	75.50%	-59.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.63%	75.50%	-55.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.10%	75.50%	-54.40%

BIBL vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIBL vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, while MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.98%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIBL and MEME in my portfolio?

BIBL and MEME have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BIBL or MEME?

On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BIBL or MEME?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BIBL or MEME?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between BIBL and MEME?

They also come from different issuers: Inspire and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for BIBL and 0.69% for MEME.