BIBDX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
BIBDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2008. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | -2.28% | 19.32% | 9.72% | 16.59% | -13.72% | 17.70% | 6.91% | 22.80% | -10.46% | 19.39% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBDX achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBDX has underperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.78% annualized return.
BIBDX
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBDX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBDX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBDX
FGIAX
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.79 | -0.79 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.30 | -0.76 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.36 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.73 | -1.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 12.62 | -6.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.79 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.80 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.58 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.42 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBDX and FGIAX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
BIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.61%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | 20.61% | 20.14% | 8.09% | 2.00% | 6.51% | 18.01% | 5.94% | 7.97% | 7.05% | 6.47% | 2.47% | 4.34% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBDX drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, smaller than the maximum FGIAX drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBDX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.81% | -49.35% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -8.29% | -2.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -21.08% | -3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.15% | -38.02% | +4.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -3.06% | -4.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -7.22% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 1.79% | +0.89% |
Volatility
BIBDX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that BIBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBDX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 4.15% | +2.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 7.07% | +2.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 12.28% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 13.08% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 15.17% | -0.04% |