BIBDX vs. FASGX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BIBDX (BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio) and FASGX (Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund) are both mutual funds - BIBDX is a Global Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while FASGX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, BIBDX returned 9.38%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for FASGX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BIBDX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FASGX.

Performance

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBDX achieves a 11.03% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's 11.93% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBDX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.38%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.01% annualized return.

BIBDX

• 1D: 0.54%
• 1M: 5.82%
• YTD: 11.03%
• 6M: 11.33%
• 1Y: 25.01%
• 3Y*: 16.21%
• 5Y*: 8.91%
• 10Y*: 9.38%

FASGX

• 1D: 0.51%
• 1M: 4.40%
• YTD: 11.93%
• 6M: 12.90%
• 1Y: 26.54%
• 3Y*: 16.47%
• 5Y*: 8.47%
• 10Y*: 10.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio	11.03%	19.32%	9.72%	16.59%	-13.72%	17.70%	6.91%	22.80%	-10.46%	19.39%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	11.93%	18.23%	10.81%	16.45%	-16.83%	13.98%	17.19%	22.81%	-7.65%	17.34%

Correlation

The correlation between BIBDX and FASGX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2008	0.90

The correlation between BIBDX and FASGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BIBDX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBDX

BIBDX Risk / Return Rank: 48
BIBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BIBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
BIBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
BIBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
BIBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

FASGX

FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BIBDX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.61	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.93	3.64	-0.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.49	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	3.39	-0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.40	14.98	-4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FASGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBDX and FASGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BIBDX	FASGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.61	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62	0.69	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62	0.79	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.63	-0.11

Drawdowns

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBDX drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBDX and FASGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BIBDX	FASGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.81%	-47.35%	+5.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-7.95%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.07%	-12.80%	-2.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.44%	-23.54%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.15%	-27.20%	-5.95%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.72%	-6.71%	+0.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	1.79%	+0.63%

Volatility

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) has a higher volatility of 3.96% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 3.30%. This indicates that BIBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BIBDX	FASGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.96%	3.30%	+0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.92%	8.39%	+1.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	10.34%	+1.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.53%	12.27%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.19%	12.65%	+2.54%

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBDX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

BIBDX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison

BIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 18.20%, more than FASGX's 6.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio	18.20%	20.14%	8.09%	2.00%	6.51%	18.01%	5.94%	7.97%	7.05%	6.47%	2.47%	4.34%
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund	6.55%	7.33%	4.60%	1.72%	6.69%	2.73%	2.20%	5.19%	6.31%	2.75%	0.20%	5.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BIBDX and FASGX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, BIBDX and FASGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, BIBDX or FASGX?

BIBDX has higher volatility (3.96%) compared to FASGX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BIBDX dropped -41.81% vs FASGX's -47.35%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.