BIBDX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BIBDX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 6, 2008. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | -2.28% | 19.32% | 9.72% | 16.59% | -13.72% | 17.70% | 6.91% | 22.80% | -10.46% | 19.39% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -0.70% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BIBDX achieves a -2.28% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, BIBDX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 8.17%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.96% annualized return.
BIBDX
- 1D
- 2.94%
- 1M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.49%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
FASGX
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -4.75%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BIBDX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BIBDX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BIBDX
FASGX
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BIBDX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.41 | -0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 2.01 | -0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.30 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 2.00 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 8.74 | -2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BIBDX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.41 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.55 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between BIBDX and FASGX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BIBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.61%, more than FASGX's 7.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BIBDX BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio | 20.61% | 20.14% | 8.09% | 2.00% | 6.51% | 18.01% | 5.94% | 7.97% | 7.05% | 6.47% | 2.47% | 4.34% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.39% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BIBDX drawdown since its inception was -41.81%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBDX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BIBDX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.81% | -47.35% | +5.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.80% | -9.07% | -1.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.44% | -23.54% | -0.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.15% | -27.20% | -5.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.75% | -5.77% | -1.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.76% | -6.74% | +0.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.07% | +0.61% |
Volatility
BIBDX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Global Dividend Portfolio (BIBDX) has a higher volatility of 6.23% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 5.30%. This indicates that BIBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BIBDX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.23% | 5.30% | +0.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.31% | 8.12% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 13.00% | +2.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 12.18% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.13% | 12.58% | +2.55% |