BGT vs. RSFYX
BGT (BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust) and RSFYX (Victory Floating Rate Fund) are both Bank Loan funds. Over the past 10 years, BGT returned 6.41%/yr vs 4.56%/yr for RSFYX. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. BGT charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for RSFYX.
Performance
BGT vs. RSFYX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BGT having a 2.82% return and RSFYX slightly higher at 2.83%. Over the past 10 years, BGT has outperformed RSFYX with an annualized return of 6.41%, while RSFYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.56% annualized return.
BGT
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- YTD
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- -3.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.38%
RSFYX
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.76%
- 6M
- 2.90%
- YTD
- 2.83%
- 1Y
- 5.62%
- 3Y*
- 7.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.90%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.51%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.54M | $1.32M | $1.16M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
BGT vs. RSFYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 2.82% | -0.84% | 16.12% | 26.29% | -16.57% | 25.89% | -0.81% | 18.97% | -11.95% | 3.91% |
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 2.83% | 7.09% | 8.64% | 7.48% | -6.82% | 4.12% | 4.96% | 9.68% | 0.69% | 4.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGT and RSFYX is 0.14, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2010 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGT vs. RSFYX — Risk / Return Rank
BGT
RSFYX
BGT vs. RSFYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) and Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BGT | RSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.47 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 4.37 | -4.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 13.69 | -14.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BGT vs. RSFYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGT drawdown since its inception was -58.06%, which is greater than RSFYX's maximum drawdown of -21.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGT and RSFYX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGT | RSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.06% | -21.42% | -36.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.93% | -1.23% | -9.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.91% | -2.76% | -13.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.19% | -8.82% | -14.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.90% | -21.42% | -20.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.45% | -0.89% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.10% | -1.33% | -6.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 0.43% | +4.98% |
Volatility
BGT vs. RSFYX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust (BGT) has a higher volatility of 3.12% compared to Victory Floating Rate Fund (RSFYX) at 0.53%. This indicates that BGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSFYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGT | RSFYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.12% | 0.53% | +2.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 3.16% | +4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.97% | 3.98% | +5.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.60% | 3.60% | +10.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.35% | 4.21% | +11.14% |
BGT vs. RSFYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGT has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than RSFYX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGT vs. RSFYX - Dividend Comparison
BGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.38%, more than RSFYX's 6.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGT BlackRock Floating Rate Income Trust | 13.38% | 12.74% | 11.22% | 10.36% | 6.87% | 5.55% | 7.58% | 6.33% | 6.64% | 5.03% | 5.03% | 6.04% |
RSFYX Victory Floating Rate Fund | 6.58% | 9.39% | 9.01% | 8.22% | 6.22% | 4.16% | 5.47% | 6.07% | 5.93% | 5.07% | 4.99% | 5.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGT and RSFYX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BGT has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to RSFYX (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGT dropped -58.06% vs RSFYX's -21.42%.
RSFYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGT and RSFYX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer