BGRFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
BGRFX is managed by Baron Capital Group, Inc.. It was launched on Dec 30, 1994. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | -12.11% | -14.51% | 4.62% | 14.68% | -22.55% | 19.82% | 32.77% | 40.18% | -2.93% | 27.14% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -12.11% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's -9.73% return. Over the past 10 years, BGRFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.30%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.95% annualized return.
BGRFX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- -7.27%
- YTD
- -12.11%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- -21.46%
- 3Y*
- -5.79%
- 5Y*
- -4.08%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGRFX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
BGRFX
SCHG
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGRFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | 0.76 | -1.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.39 | 1.24 | -2.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.17 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.82 | 1.09 | -1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.76 | 3.71 | -5.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGRFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.02 | 0.76 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.21 | 0.57 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.79 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.79 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGRFX and SCHG is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.79%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGRFX Baron Growth Fund | 23.79% | 20.91% | 12.05% | 1.79% | 6.02% | 7.73% | 4.64% | 3.68% | 8.38% | 11.68% | 12.84% | 9.53% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGRFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.10% | -34.59% | -21.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.59% | -16.41% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.70% | -34.59% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.14% | -34.59% | -6.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.30% | -12.51% | -18.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.72% | -5.22% | -3.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.94% | 4.84% | +7.10% |
Volatility
BGRFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) is 5.53%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that BGRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGRFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 6.77% | -1.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.28% | 12.54% | +0.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.24% | 22.45% | -1.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.89% | 22.31% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 21.51% | -0.54% |