PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGRFX vs. FBCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BGRFX
Baron Growth Fund
-12.11%-14.51%4.62%14.68%-22.55%19.82%32.51%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
-7.08%18.60%39.05%57.98%-39.10%21.34%42.99%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGRFX achieves a -12.11% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's -7.08% return.


BGRFX

1D
1.77%
1M
-7.27%
YTD
-12.11%
6M
-13.84%
1Y
-21.46%
3Y*
-5.79%
5Y*
-4.08%
10Y*
7.30%

FBCG

1D
1.68%
1M
-3.96%
YTD
-7.08%
6M
-5.08%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
26.11%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BGRFX vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGRFX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BGRFX vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGRFX
BGRFX Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
BGRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
BGRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

FBCG
FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGRFXFBCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.02

1.00

-2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.39

1.57

-2.96

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.22

-0.39

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.82

1.82

-2.64

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.76

6.44

-8.20

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGRFX Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the FBCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGRFX and FBCG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGRFXFBCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.02

1.00

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

0.44

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.68

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between BGRFX and FBCG is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

BGRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.79%, more than FBCG's 0.05% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGRFX
Baron Growth Fund
23.79%20.91%12.05%1.79%6.02%7.73%4.64%3.68%8.38%11.68%12.84%9.53%
FBCG
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF
0.05%0.05%0.12%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGRFX drawdown since its inception was -56.10%, which is greater than FBCG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGRFX and FBCG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BGRFXFBCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.10%

-43.56%

-12.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.59%

-15.17%

-10.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.70%

-43.56%

+8.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.30%

-9.60%

-21.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.72%

-11.78%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.94%

4.28%

+7.66%

Volatility

BGRFX vs. FBCG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baron Growth Fund (BGRFX) is 5.53%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a volatility of 8.39%. This indicates that BGRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BGRFXFBCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

8.39%

-2.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.28%

14.84%

-1.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.24%

26.33%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.89%

25.82%

-5.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

25.92%

-4.95%