PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGLTX vs. YFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


BGLTX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

YFSNX

1D
-0.25%
1M
-2.97%
6M
16.11%
YTD
21.44%
1Y
16.95%
3Y*
13.78%
5Y*
8.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
-11.38%16.38%25.03%36.61%-46.09%2.47%102.05%33.53%-1.37%39.31%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
21.44%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%13.00%18.32%24.48%2.18%20.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and YFSNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017

0.51

The correlation between BGLTX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGLTX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BGLTXYFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.73

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGLTXYFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.73%

Volatility

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGLTXYFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.33%

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGLTX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither BGLTX nor YFSNX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BGLTX
Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.84%5.15%8.39%0.15%10.07%0.00%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


BGLTX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGLTX and YFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer