BGLTX vs. BGCBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

BGLTX (Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund) and BGCBX (Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund) are both mutual funds - BGLTX is a Global Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds, while BGCBX is a China Equities fund managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. Over the past 3 years, BGLTX returned 12.32%/yr vs 11.01%/yr for BGCBX. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BGLTX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BGCBX.

Performance

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BGLTX achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than BGCBX's 0.72% return.

BGLTX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.55%
• YTD: -11.38%
• 6M: -12.36%
• 1Y: -6.19%
• 3Y*: 12.32%
• 5Y*: -0.95%
• 10Y*: 14.94%

BGCBX

• 1D: 2.96%
• 1M: 1.31%
• YTD: 0.72%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 21.74%
• 3Y*: 11.01%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	-11.38%	16.38%	25.03%	36.61%	-46.09%	-5.83%
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.72%	36.51%	9.74%	-18.00%	-28.56%	-17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between BGLTX and BGCBX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 8, 2021	0.54

The correlation between BGLTX and BGCBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BGLTX vs. BGCBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGLTX

BGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 2
BGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
BGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

BGCBX

BGCBX Risk / Return Rank: 18
BGCBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
BGCBX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
BGCBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
BGCBX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) and Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	BGLTX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	1.25	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.27	1.81	-2.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.22	-0.26
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	1.68	-1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.53	4.22	-4.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGLTX Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the BGCBX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGLTX and BGCBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	BGLTX	BGCBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	1.25	-1.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	-0.23	+0.51

Drawdowns

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGLTX drawdown since its inception was -70.17%, which is greater than BGCBX's maximum drawdown of -59.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGLTX and BGCBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	BGLTX	BGCBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.17%	-59.07%	-11.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.64%	-13.48%	-12.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.28%	-28.54%	+1.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-70.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-70.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.45%	-27.90%	+9.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.03%	-38.29%	+22.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.19%	5.37%	+5.82%

Volatility

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund (BGLTX) is 3.65%, while Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that BGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGCBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BGLTX	BGCBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	5.62%	-1.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.67%	12.57%	+3.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.51%	18.11%	+2.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	67.82%	27.04%	+40.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.05%	27.04%	+24.01%

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGLTX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BGCBX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

BGLTX vs. BGCBX - Dividend Comparison

BGLTX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BGCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund	0.91%	0.91%	2.03%	1.50%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
BGLTX Baillie Gifford Long Term Global Growth Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.84%	5.15%	8.39%	0.15%	10.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BGLTX and BGCBX in my portfolio?

BGLTX and BGCBX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BGLTX or BGCBX?

BGCBX has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to BGLTX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGLTX dropped -70.17% vs BGCBX's -59.07%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BGCBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.