BGCBX vs. FHKIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX).
BGCBX is managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. It was launched on Jul 6, 2021. FHKIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008.
Performance
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund | -6.09% | 36.51% | 9.74% | -18.00% | -28.56% | -17.30% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 8.35% | 42.60% | 23.15% | -0.28% | -23.85% | -14.68% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGCBX achieves a -6.09% return, which is significantly lower than FHKIX's 8.35% return.
BGCBX
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -6.36%
- YTD
- -6.09%
- 6M
- -11.53%
- 1Y
- 10.26%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FHKIX
- 1D
- 2.70%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- YTD
- 8.35%
- 6M
- 7.83%
- 1Y
- 46.42%
- 3Y*
- 20.95%
- 5Y*
- 2.95%
- 10Y*
- 12.46%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGCBX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is higher than FHKIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BGCBX vs. FHKIX — Risk / Return Rank
BGCBX
FHKIX
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) and Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGCBX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.50 | 2.06 | -1.57 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.79 | 2.62 | -1.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.38 | -0.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.94 | -2.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 11.29 | -9.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGCBX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 | 2.06 | -1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.29 | 0.33 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between BGCBX and FHKIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Dividend Comparison
BGCBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than FHKIX's 1.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGCBX Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund | 0.97% | 0.91% | 2.03% | 1.50% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FHKIX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I | 1.70% | 1.84% | 1.44% | 1.89% | 1.04% | 10.81% | 4.90% | 0.65% | 0.79% | 0.44% | 1.40% | 15.62% |
Drawdowns
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGCBX drawdown since its inception was -59.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FHKIX drawdown of -58.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGCBX and FHKIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGCBX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.07% | -58.42% | -0.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.88% | -15.90% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -53.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -58.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.77% | -8.39% | -24.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.61% | -18.84% | -19.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 4.15% | +0.83% |
Volatility
BGCBX vs. FHKIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Baillie Gifford China Equities Fund (BGCBX) is 6.29%, while Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class I (FHKIX) has a volatility of 9.78%. This indicates that BGCBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHKIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BGCBX | FHKIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 9.78% | -3.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 16.55% | -3.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.42% | 23.25% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 23.98% | +3.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.29% | 22.10% | +5.19% |