BGHSX vs. FKDNX
BGHSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund) and FKDNX (Franklin DynaTech Fund) are both mutual funds - BGHSX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while FKDNX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 3 years, BGHSX returned 8.00%/yr vs 25.36%/yr for FKDNX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BGHSX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for FKDNX.
Performance
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BGHSX achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly lower than FKDNX's 12.20% return.
BGHSX
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- YTD
- 0.14%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 4.58%
- 3Y*
- 8.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FKDNX
- 1D
- -1.14%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 12.20%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 28.27%
- 3Y*
- 25.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 0.14% | 5.55% | 9.90% | 13.21% | -10.23% | 1.12% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 12.20% | 18.59% | 30.57% | 44.42% | -40.30% | -2.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGHSX and FKDNX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGHSX vs. FKDNX — Risk / Return Rank
BGHSX
FKDNX
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGHSX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.25 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.43 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.15 | 4.46 | +2.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGHSX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.84 | 0.67 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, smaller than the maximum FKDNX drawdown of -51.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and FKDNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGHSX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -51.63% | +37.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -20.49% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.55% | -26.23% | +21.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -48.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -48.28% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -1.14% | +0.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -11.25% | +8.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 6.57% | -5.91% |
Volatility
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) is 0.88%, while Franklin DynaTech Fund (FKDNX) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that BGHSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKDNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGHSX | FKDNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.88% | 4.99% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 15.86% | -13.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.17% | 20.41% | -17.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 26.20% | -21.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 24.61% | -20.13% |
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than FKDNX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGHSX vs. FKDNX - Dividend Comparison
BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.26%, less than FKDNX's 9.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 6.26% | 7.08% | 7.49% | 5.23% | 5.32% | 4.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FKDNX Franklin DynaTech Fund | 9.95% | 11.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.92% | 1.77% | 3.55% | 2.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BGHSX and FKDNX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FKDNX has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to BGHSX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHSX dropped -14.30% vs FKDNX's -51.63%.
BGHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGHSX and FKDNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer