PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BGHSX vs. BCAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BGHSX having a 0.34% return and BCAAX slightly lower at 0.33%.


BGHSX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.53%
YTD
0.34%
6M
0.72%
1Y
4.90%
3Y*
8.07%
5Y*
10Y*

BCAAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
7.34%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
0.34%5.55%9.90%13.21%-10.23%1.12%
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
0.33%5.27%8.92%11.47%-9.47%1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BGHSX and BCAAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021

0.94

The correlation between BGHSX and BCAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BGHSX vs. BCAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BGHSX
BGHSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
BGHSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGHSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGHSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
BGHSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGHSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BCAAX
BCAAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
BCAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
BCAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BGHSXBCAAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

1.82

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

7.84

-0.06

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BGHSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is comparable to the BCAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BGHSX and BCAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BGHSXBCAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.58

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.84

+0.01

Drawdowns

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, which is greater than BCAAX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and BCAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BGHSXBCAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.30%

-13.21%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-2.48%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.55%

-3.71%

-0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.24%

-3.01%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.57%

+0.09%

Volatility

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Volatility Comparison

BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) at 0.82%. This indicates that BGHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BGHSXBCAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

0.82%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.31%

2.22%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.16%

2.86%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.48%

4.04%

+0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.48%

4.04%

+0.44%

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BCAAX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Dividend Comparison

BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than BCAAX's 5.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BCAAX
BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund
5.61%6.27%6.87%4.68%4.99%3.91%
BGHSX
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund
6.25%7.08%7.49%5.23%5.32%4.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, BGHSX and BCAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BGHSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BCAAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHSX dropped -14.30% vs BCAAX's -13.21%.

BGHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BGHSX and BCAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer