BGHSX vs. BCAAX
BGHSX (BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund) and BCAAX (BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund) are both High Yield Bonds funds from Franklin Templeton. Over the past 3 years, BGHSX returned 8.07%/yr vs 7.34%/yr for BCAAX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BGHSX charges 0.54%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for BCAAX.
Performance
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BGHSX having a 0.34% return and BCAAX slightly lower at 0.33%.
BGHSX
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.53%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- 0.72%
- 1Y
- 4.90%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 4.40%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 0.34% | 5.55% | 9.90% | 13.21% | -10.23% | 1.12% |
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | 0.33% | 5.27% | 8.92% | 11.47% | -9.47% | 1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between BGHSX and BCAAX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2021 | 0.94 |
The correlation between BGHSX and BCAAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BGHSX vs. BCAAX — Risk / Return Rank
BGHSX
BCAAX
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) and BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BGHSX | BCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 1.82 | +0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | 7.84 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BGHSX | BCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.58 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.84 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BGHSX drawdown since its inception was -14.30%, which is greater than BCAAX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BGHSX and BCAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BGHSX | BCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.30% | -13.21% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.67% | -2.48% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.55% | -3.71% | -0.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.24% | -3.01% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 0.57% | +0.09% |
Volatility
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Volatility Comparison
BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund (BGHSX) has a higher volatility of 0.91% compared to BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund (BCAAX) at 0.82%. This indicates that BGHSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BGHSX | BCAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | 0.82% | +0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.31% | 2.22% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.16% | 2.86% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 4.04% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.48% | 4.04% | +0.44% |
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BGHSX has a 0.54% expense ratio, which is lower than BCAAX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
BGHSX vs. BCAAX - Dividend Comparison
BGHSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.25%, more than BCAAX's 5.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCAAX BrandywineGLOBAL - Corporate Credit Fund | 5.61% | 6.27% | 6.87% | 4.68% | 4.99% | 3.91% |
BGHSX BrandywineGLOBAL - High Yield Fund | 6.25% | 7.08% | 7.49% | 5.23% | 5.32% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, BGHSX and BCAAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BGHSX has higher volatility (0.91%) compared to BCAAX (0.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BGHSX dropped -14.30% vs BCAAX's -13.21%.
BGHSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BGHSX and BCAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer