BFS vs. CLH
BFS (Saul Centers, Inc.) and CLH (Clean Harbors, Inc.) are both stocks. BFS operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while CLH operates in Waste Management (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, BFS returned 0.74%/yr vs 18.94%/yr for CLH. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BFS vs. CLH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFS achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly lower than CLH's 23.62% return. Over the past 10 years, BFS has underperformed CLH with an annualized return of 0.74%, while CLH has yielded a comparatively higher 18.94% annualized return.
BFS
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.74%
CLH
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 1.03%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 6M
- 20.88%
- 1Y
- 26.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.09%
- 5Y*
- 26.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.94%
BFS vs. CLH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFS Saul Centers, Inc. | 20.87% | -12.83% | 5.01% | 2.65% | -19.38% | 76.58% | -36.18% | 16.33% | -20.48% | -4.22% |
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 23.62% | 1.89% | 31.88% | 52.92% | 14.38% | 31.10% | -11.25% | 73.76% | -8.95% | -2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFS and CLH is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 1993 | 0.24 |
The correlation between BFS and CLH shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.41 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BFS:
$2.03
CLH:
$7.40
BFS:
18.13
CLH:
39.19
BFS:
2.24
CLH:
2.56
BFS:
$297.97M
CLH:
$6.06B
BFS:
$205.65M
CLH:
$1.81B
BFS:
$197.53M
CLH:
$1.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFS vs. CLH — Risk / Return Rank
BFS
CLH
BFS vs. CLH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) and Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFS | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.20 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 1.34 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 4.07 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFS vs. CLH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFS drawdown since its inception was -65.89%, smaller than the maximum CLH drawdown of -93.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFS and CLH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFS | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.89% | -93.48% | +27.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -19.45% | +6.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -30.86% | +6.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -30.86% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.93% | -64.51% | +5.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.26% | -7.60% | -6.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -32.87% | +18.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 6.41% | +0.16% |
Volatility
BFS vs. CLH - Volatility Comparison
Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) at 7.06%. This indicates that BFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFS | CLH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 7.06% | +0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 19.07% | -4.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 27.24% | -7.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 28.61% | -3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 34.75% | -2.16% |
Dividends
BFS vs. CLH - Dividend Comparison
BFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, while CLH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFS Saul Centers, Inc. | 6.42% | 7.48% | 6.08% | 6.01% | 5.70% | 4.07% | 6.69% | 4.02% | 4.40% | 3.30% | 2.76% | 3.30% |
CLH Clean Harbors, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BFS vs. CLH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saul Centers, Inc. and Clean Harbors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BFS vs. CLH - Profitability Comparison
BFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.80M and revenue of 78.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
CLH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.42M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.
BFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.52M and revenue of 78.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 79.9%.
CLH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.94M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.
BFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported a net income of 9.12M and revenue of 78.26M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
CLH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a net income of 63.20M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFS and CLH have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BFS has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to CLH (7.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFS dropped -65.89% vs CLH's -93.48%.
CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFS and CLH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer