BFS vs. FN
BFS (Saul Centers, Inc.) and FN (Fabrinet) are both stocks. BFS operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate), while FN operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, BFS returned 0.74%/yr vs 32.51%/yr for FN. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
BFS vs. FN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFS achieves a 20.87% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 28.17% return. Over the past 10 years, BFS has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 0.74%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 32.51% annualized return.
BFS
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- 20.87%
- 6M
- 22.66%
- 1Y
- 12.12%
- 3Y*
- 8.01%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- 0.74%
FN
- 1D
- -5.44%
- 1M
- -17.09%
- YTD
- 28.17%
- 6M
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 116.23%
- 3Y*
- 67.51%
- 5Y*
- 43.76%
- 10Y*
- 32.51%
BFS vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFS Saul Centers, Inc. | 20.87% | -12.83% | 5.01% | 2.65% | -19.38% | 76.58% | -36.18% | 16.33% | -20.48% | -4.22% |
FN Fabrinet | 28.17% | 107.06% | 15.53% | 48.44% | 8.23% | 52.69% | 19.66% | 26.37% | 78.78% | -28.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFS and FN is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010 | 0.26 |
The correlation between BFS and FN shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.27 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
BFS:
$2.03
FN:
$11.65
BFS:
18.13
FN:
50.10
BFS:
2.24
FN:
4.98
BFS:
$297.97M
FN:
$4.24B
BFS:
$205.65M
FN:
$509.75M
BFS:
$197.53M
FN:
$422.55M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFS vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank
BFS
FN
BFS vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.28 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 5.05 | -4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 12.31 | -10.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFS vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFS drawdown since its inception was -65.89%, smaller than the maximum FN drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFS and FN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.89% | -70.46% | +4.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.03% | -23.14% | +10.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.07% | -37.47% | +13.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.81% | -38.70% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.93% | -51.11% | -7.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.26% | -21.83% | +7.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.63% | -22.58% | +7.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.57% | 9.48% | -2.91% |
Volatility
BFS vs. FN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Saul Centers, Inc. (BFS) is 7.51%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 25.34%. This indicates that BFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFS | FN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 25.34% | -17.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.25% | 55.65% | -41.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.91% | 67.70% | -47.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.81% | 53.99% | -29.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 48.44% | -15.85% |
Dividends
BFS vs. FN - Dividend Comparison
BFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFS Saul Centers, Inc. | 6.42% | 7.48% | 6.08% | 6.01% | 5.70% | 4.07% | 6.69% | 4.02% | 4.40% | 3.30% | 2.76% | 3.30% |
FN Fabrinet | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
BFS vs. FN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Saul Centers, Inc. and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BFS vs. FN - Profitability Comparison
BFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported a gross profit of 69.80M and revenue of 78.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 89.2%.
FN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.
BFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported an operating income of 62.52M and revenue of 78.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 79.9%.
FN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
BFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Saul Centers, Inc. reported a net income of 9.12M and revenue of 78.26M, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
FN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFS and FN have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FN has higher volatility (25.34%) compared to BFS (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFS dropped -65.89% vs FN's -70.46%.
FN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFS and FN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer