BFOR vs. RIGS
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS).
BFOR and RIGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400 Index. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. RIGS is an actively managed fund by SS&C. It was launched on Oct 9, 2013.
Performance
BFOR vs. RIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BFOR vs. RIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.80% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 17.60% | 21.30% | -13.86% | 19.37% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 0.29% | 4.63% | 4.45% | 6.07% | -5.72% | 1.93% | 3.58% | 7.60% | -0.11% | 4.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly higher than RIGS's 0.29% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has outperformed RIGS with an annualized return of 11.62%, while RIGS has yielded a comparatively lower 3.30% annualized return.
BFOR
- 1D
- 2.41%
- 1M
- -5.32%
- YTD
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 20.24%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
RIGS
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- -1.32%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.52%
- 1Y
- 3.83%
- 3Y*
- 4.32%
- 5Y*
- 2.17%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFOR vs. RIGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RIGS's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BFOR vs. RIGS — Risk / Return Rank
BFOR
RIGS
BFOR vs. RIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFOR | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.38 | +0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 0.61 | +0.94 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.08 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 0.66 | +0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 1.68 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFOR | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.38 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.29 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.43 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.45 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and RIGS is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BFOR vs. RIGS - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than RIGS's 4.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.59% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
RIGS RiverFront Strategic Income Fund | 4.84% | 4.84% | 4.49% | 3.48% | 2.71% | 2.47% | 3.77% | 3.87% | 4.54% | 4.45% | 4.46% | 3.61% |
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. RIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, which is greater than RIGS's maximum drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and RIGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOR | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -15.31% | -25.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.75% | -5.18% | -7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -9.03% | -16.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.27% | -15.31% | -25.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -2.14% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.49% | -1.59% | -4.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 2.04% | +0.98% |
Volatility
BFOR vs. RIGS - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) has a higher volatility of 5.74% compared to RiverFront Strategic Income Fund (RIGS) at 2.34%. This indicates that BFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BFOR | RIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.74% | 2.34% | +3.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.41% | 6.17% | +5.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.99% | 10.16% | +9.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 7.47% | +11.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 7.75% | +12.66% |