PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOR vs. VTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOR vs. VTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 15.05% return, which is significantly lower than VTWO's 18.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has outperformed VTWO with an annualized return of 12.64%, while VTWO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.


BFOR

1D
0.20%
1M
-0.61%
6M
11.25%
YTD
15.05%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
17.17%
5Y*
10.70%
10Y*
12.64%
ALL TIME*
11.54%

VTWO

1D
-0.42%
1M
-2.08%
6M
12.79%
YTD
18.91%
1Y
37.17%
3Y*
15.32%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
10.85%
ALL TIME*
11.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$667.88K$621.15K$445.26K
$175.65M$196.25M$231.49M

BFOR vs. VTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFOR
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF
15.05%13.85%17.81%18.19%-15.92%30.71%17.60%21.30%-13.86%19.37%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
18.91%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOR and VTWO is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.94

The correlation between BFOR and VTWO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

BFOR vs. VTWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BFOR
VTWO

Financial Services

21.8%
17.6%

Technology

20.9%
14.8%

Industrials

16.4%
14.1%

Healthcare

11.9%
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
9.2%

Energy

6.4%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
2.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
2.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
4.4%

Utilities

1.8%
2.7%

Real Estate

-

6.7%

Financial Services

BFOR
21.8%
VTWO
17.6%

Technology

BFOR
20.9%
VTWO
14.8%

Industrials

BFOR
16.4%
VTWO
14.1%

Healthcare

BFOR
11.9%
VTWO
20.2%

Consumer Cyclical

BFOR
10.9%
VTWO
9.2%

Energy

BFOR
6.4%
VTWO
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

BFOR
4.0%
VTWO
2.6%

Communication Services

BFOR
3.5%
VTWO
2.2%

Basic Materials

BFOR
2.4%
VTWO
4.4%

Utilities

BFOR
1.8%
VTWO
2.7%

Real Estate

BFOR

-

VTWO
6.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOR vs. VTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BFOR
BFOR Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
BFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BFOR vs. VTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BFORVTWODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.30

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.14

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.03

11.17

-2.14

BFOR vs. VTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the VTWO Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFOR and VTWO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BFOR vs. VTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, roughly equal to the maximum VTWO drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and VTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFORVTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.27%

-41.19%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-10.99%

+2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-27.57%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-31.88%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.27%

-41.19%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-3.04%

+2.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.36%

-8.32%

+1.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

3.09%

-0.63%

Volatility

BFOR vs. VTWO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) is 3.05%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a volatility of 3.79%. This indicates that BFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFORVTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

3.79%

-0.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

14.10%

-3.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.84%

19.35%

-4.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.40%

22.43%

-3.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.34%

23.06%

-2.72%

BFOR vs. VTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWO's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOR vs. VTWO - Dividend Comparison

BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than VTWO's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFOR
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF
0.52%0.60%0.69%1.26%1.68%0.92%0.98%0.69%0.94%0.60%0.78%0.86%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.11%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, BFOR and VTWO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWO has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to BFOR (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOR dropped -41.27% vs VTWO's -41.19%.

On 10-year performance, BFOR leads with 12.64% vs 10.85% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, BFOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, BFOR has performed better with a 12.64% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BFOR.

VTWO has the higher dividend yield at 1.11%, compared with 0.52% for BFOR.

BFOR is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while VTWO is Small Cap Blend Equities. BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index, while VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BFOR and 0.06% for VTWO.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOR and VTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer