PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFOR vs. SPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFOR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 9.89% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 12.37%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.49% annualized return.


BFOR

1D
-0.49%
1M
2.26%
YTD
9.89%
6M
10.61%
1Y
22.04%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
9.98%
10Y*
12.37%

SPY

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.05%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.91%
1Y
27.98%
3Y*
22.35%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*
15.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFOR vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BFOR
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF
9.89%13.85%17.81%18.19%-15.92%30.71%17.60%21.30%-13.86%19.37%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.72%24.89%26.18%-18.18%28.73%18.33%31.22%-4.57%21.71%

Correlation

The correlation between BFOR and SPY is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.86

The correlation between BFOR and SPY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BFOR vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BFOR
SPY

Financial Services

21.3%
11.8%

Technology

18.8%
35.9%

Industrials

16.7%
7.8%

Healthcare

12.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
10.3%

Energy

7.8%
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.8%

Communication Services

3.6%
11.3%

Basic Materials

2.8%
1.8%

Utilities

1.9%
2.4%

Real Estate

-

1.9%

Financial Services

BFOR
21.3%
SPY
11.8%

Technology

BFOR
18.8%
SPY
35.9%

Industrials

BFOR
16.7%
SPY
7.8%

Healthcare

BFOR
12.0%
SPY
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

BFOR
11.1%
SPY
10.3%

Energy

BFOR
7.8%
SPY
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

BFOR
4.2%
SPY
4.8%

Communication Services

BFOR
3.6%
SPY
11.3%

Basic Materials

BFOR
2.8%
SPY
1.8%

Utilities

BFOR
1.9%
SPY
2.4%

Real Estate

BFOR

-

SPY
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFOR vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFOR
BFOR Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
BFOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFOR Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
BFOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFOR Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

SPY
SPY Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPY Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFOR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFORSPYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.50

2.38

-0.88

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.23

3.24

-1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.43

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

3.16

-0.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.02

14.72

-5.70

BFOR vs. SPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the SPY Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFOR and SPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFORSPYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.38

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.82

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.87

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.59

0.00

Drawdowns

BFOR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, smaller than the maximum SPY drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and SPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFORSPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.27%

-55.19%

+13.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.98%

-8.88%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.91%

-18.76%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.93%

-24.50%

-1.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.27%

-33.72%

-7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-0.70%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-9.05%

+2.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.45%

1.91%

+0.54%

Volatility

BFOR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison

ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 2.84%. This indicates that BFOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFORSPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

2.84%

+0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.64%

8.90%

+1.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.80%

11.83%

+2.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.41%

17.05%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

17.94%

+2.47%

BFOR vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFOR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFOR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison

BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than SPY's 0.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFOR
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF
0.54%0.60%0.69%1.26%1.68%0.92%0.98%0.69%0.94%0.60%0.78%0.86%
SPY
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
0.98%1.07%1.21%1.40%1.65%1.20%1.52%1.75%2.04%1.80%2.03%2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFOR and SPY have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BFOR has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to SPY (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOR dropped -41.27% vs SPY's -55.19%.

On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.49% vs 12.37% for BFOR. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.49% return vs 12.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BFOR.

SPY has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.54% for BFOR.

BFOR is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while SPY is S&P 500. BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BFOR and 0.09% for SPY.

SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFOR and SPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer