BFOR vs. FFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY).
BFOR and FFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. FFTY is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD 50 Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. Both BFOR and FFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BFOR or FFTY.
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and FFTY is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BFOR vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
BFOR:
0.38
FFTY:
0.07
BFOR:
0.73
FFTY:
0.37
BFOR:
1.10
FFTY:
1.05
BFOR:
0.39
FFTY:
0.07
BFOR:
1.27
FFTY:
0.32
BFOR:
6.76%
FFTY:
11.22%
BFOR:
21.10%
FFTY:
31.67%
BFOR:
-41.26%
FFTY:
-59.46%
BFOR:
-9.13%
FFTY:
-44.61%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a -1.47% return, which is significantly higher than FFTY's -3.04% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has outperformed FFTY with an annualized return of 9.01%, while FFTY has yielded a comparatively lower 1.86% annualized return.
BFOR
-1.47%
11.18%
-6.80%
8.03%
15.92%
9.01%
FFTY
-3.04%
10.79%
-7.06%
2.29%
-1.96%
1.86%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFOR vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BFOR vs. FFTY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
BFOR
FFTY
BFOR vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
BFOR vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than FFTY's 0.93% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.70% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.72% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 0.93% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.26%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and FFTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
BFOR vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) have volatilities of 6.97% and 6.84%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...