BFOR vs. FFTY
Compare and contrast key facts about ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY).
BFOR and FFTY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFOR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Barron's 400. It was launched on Jun 4, 2013. FFTY is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the IBD 50 Index. It was launched on Apr 9, 2015. Both BFOR and FFTY are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: BFOR or FFTY.
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and FFTY is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
BFOR vs. FFTY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
BFOR:
1.12
FFTY:
0.82
BFOR:
1.64
FFTY:
1.25
BFOR:
1.21
FFTY:
1.15
BFOR:
2.18
FFTY:
0.39
BFOR:
6.32
FFTY:
3.40
BFOR:
2.78%
FFTY:
6.23%
BFOR:
15.70%
FFTY:
25.78%
BFOR:
-41.26%
FFTY:
-59.46%
BFOR:
-7.04%
FFTY:
-40.70%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly lower than FFTY's 22.86% return.
BFOR
18.75%
-6.46%
11.43%
17.85%
12.61%
9.79%
FFTY
22.86%
-4.14%
7.81%
21.66%
-2.37%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFOR vs. FFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than FFTY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
BFOR vs. FFTY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
BFOR vs. FFTY - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, while FFTY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 0.18% |
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 0.00% | 0.64% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. FFTY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.26%, smaller than the maximum FFTY drawdown of -59.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and FFTY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
BFOR vs. FFTY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) is 4.68%, while Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a volatility of 10.16%. This indicates that BFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.