BFOR vs. RDOG
BFOR (ALPS Barron's 400 ETF) and RDOG (ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFOR is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barron's 400 Index, while RDOG is a REIT fund tracking the S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, BFOR returned 13.11%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for RDOG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFOR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RDOG.
Performance
BFOR vs. RDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFOR achieves a 12.73% return, which is significantly lower than RDOG's 17.52% return. Over the past 10 years, BFOR has outperformed RDOG with an annualized return of 13.11%, while RDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 4.49% annualized return.
BFOR
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 24.60%
- 3Y*
- 20.01%
- 5Y*
- 10.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.11%
RDOG
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- YTD
- 17.52%
- 6M
- 19.48%
- 1Y
- 20.13%
- 3Y*
- 13.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 4.49%
BFOR vs. RDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 12.73% | 13.85% | 17.81% | 18.19% | -15.92% | 30.71% | 17.60% | 21.30% | -13.86% | 19.37% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.52% | 0.95% | 4.57% | 10.38% | -25.53% | 34.42% | -10.01% | 21.54% | -5.70% | 11.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFOR and RDOG is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013 | 0.59 |
The correlation between BFOR and RDOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFOR vs. RDOG — Risk / Return Rank
BFOR
RDOG
BFOR vs. RDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) and ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFOR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | 2.02 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | 6.52 | +3.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFOR vs. RDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFOR drawdown since its inception was -41.27%, smaller than the maximum RDOG drawdown of -67.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFOR and RDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFOR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.27% | -67.59% | +26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -10.02% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.91% | -21.40% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.93% | -35.52% | +9.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.27% | -49.35% | +8.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | -1.08% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.40% | -12.23% | +5.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.10% | -0.65% |
Volatility
BFOR vs. RDOG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ALPS Barron's 400 ETF (BFOR) is 4.11%, while ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF (RDOG) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that BFOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFOR | RDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.11% | 4.55% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.97% | 11.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.03% | 14.91% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 19.85% | -0.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 23.05% | -2.65% |
BFOR vs. RDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFOR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RDOG's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFOR vs. RDOG - Dividend Comparison
BFOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, less than RDOG's 6.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFOR ALPS Barron's 400 ETF | 0.53% | 0.60% | 0.69% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.92% | 0.98% | 0.69% | 0.94% | 0.60% | 0.78% | 0.86% |
RDOG ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF | 6.21% | 6.91% | 6.11% | 7.07% | 5.25% | 3.11% | 5.12% | 3.10% | 3.13% | 3.64% | 3.66% | 3.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFOR and RDOG have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDOG has higher volatility (4.55%) compared to BFOR (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFOR dropped -41.27% vs RDOG's -67.59%.
On 10-year performance, BFOR leads with 13.11% vs 4.49% for RDOG. On fees, RDOG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BFOR has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, BFOR has performed better with a 13.11% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RDOG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for BFOR.
RDOG has the higher dividend yield at 6.21%, compared with 0.53% for BFOR.
BFOR is categorized as Mid Cap Blend Equities, while RDOG is REIT. BFOR tracks Barron's 400 Index, while RDOG tracks S-Network REIT Dividend Dogs Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for BFOR and 0.35% for RDOG.
BFOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BFOR and RDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer