BFMCX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
BFMCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 9, 1992. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | -0.83% | 7.43% | 0.66% | 5.32% | -14.35% | -1.52% | 8.32% | 9.85% | -0.28% | 3.16% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFMCX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, BFMCX has underperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 1.54%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.70% annualized return.
BFMCX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.72%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.90%
- 5Y*
- -0.33%
- 10Y*
- 1.54%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BFMCX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
BFMCX
FASGX
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFMCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.33 | 1.73 | -0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.26 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.50 | 1.55 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.75 | 6.89 | -2.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFMCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.21 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.53 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.70 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.60 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between BFMCX and FASGX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 3.92% | 4.10% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 5.78% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.57% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, smaller than the maximum FASGX drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFMCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -47.35% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -9.07% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -23.54% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.49% | -27.20% | +7.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.73% | -7.95% | +3.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -6.74% | +4.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 2.04% | -1.03% |
Volatility
BFMCX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) is 1.78%, while Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a volatility of 4.57%. This indicates that BFMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BFMCX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 4.57% | -2.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 7.78% | -5.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.46% | 12.82% | -8.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 12.14% | -6.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 12.56% | -7.53% |