BFMCX vs. TAUSX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX).
BFMCX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 9, 1992. TAUSX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 31, 1991.
Performance
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | -0.58% | 7.43% | 0.66% | 5.32% | -14.35% | -1.52% | 8.32% | 9.85% | -0.28% | 3.16% |
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | -0.56% | 7.38% | 0.94% | 4.76% | -14.69% | -1.49% | 9.52% | 8.71% | -0.38% | 3.88% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with BFMCX having a -0.58% return and TAUSX slightly higher at -0.56%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BFMCX having a 1.56% annualized return and TAUSX not far ahead at 1.61%.
BFMCX
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -0.58%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- 1Y
- 3.70%
- 3Y*
- 2.98%
- 5Y*
- -0.34%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
TAUSX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -0.56%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 3.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.46%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFMCX has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than TAUSX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BFMCX vs. TAUSX — Risk / Return Rank
BFMCX
TAUSX
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) and John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFMCX | TAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.16 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.38 | 1.43 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.32 | 4.17 | +0.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFMCX | TAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 0.88 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | -0.08 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.32 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.02 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between BFMCX and TAUSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Dividend Comparison
BFMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than TAUSX's 3.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFMCX BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio | 3.91% | 4.10% | 3.86% | 3.21% | 1.86% | 2.11% | 5.78% | 2.86% | 3.02% | 2.69% | 2.41% | 2.57% |
TAUSX John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund | 3.70% | 3.99% | 3.40% | 2.64% | 2.50% | 2.25% | 4.49% | 2.83% | 2.83% | 2.65% | 2.66% | 2.88% |
Drawdowns
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFMCX drawdown since its inception was -19.49%, roughly equal to the maximum TAUSX drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFMCX and TAUSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFMCX | TAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.49% | -19.90% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.19% | -3.11% | -0.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -19.90% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.49% | -19.90% | +0.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.50% | -5.13% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -2.36% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.02% | 1.06% | -0.04% |
Volatility
BFMCX vs. TAUSX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Core Bond Portfolio (BFMCX) has a higher volatility of 1.78% compared to John Hancock Investment Grade Bond Fund (TAUSX) at 1.67%. This indicates that BFMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAUSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BFMCX | TAUSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 1.67% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | 2.68% | +0.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.45% | 4.56% | -0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.10% | 6.02% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.03% | 4.97% | +0.06% |