PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFLB vs. LJUL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFLB vs. LJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLB achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than LJUL's 1.80% return.


BFLB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.53%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LJUL

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.80%
6M
2.30%
1Y
5.49%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLB vs. LJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFLB and LJUL is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.73

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFLB vs. LJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLB

LJUL
LJUL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
LJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
LJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLB vs. LJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July (LJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFLB vs. LJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFLBLJULDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

1.78

-0.07

Drawdowns

BFLB vs. LJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, which is greater than LJUL's maximum drawdown of -3.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and LJUL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFLBLJULDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-3.21%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.04%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-0.12%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.10%

Volatility

BFLB vs. LJUL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFLBLJULDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

1.58%

+6.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.76%

3.25%

+4.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

3.25%

+4.51%

BFLB vs. LJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BFLB and LJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

BFLB vs. LJUL - Dividend Comparison

BFLB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LJUL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.23%.


PositionTTM20252024
BFLB
BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
LJUL
Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
5.23%5.36%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFLB and LJUL have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BFLB and LJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

LJUL has the higher dividend yield at 5.23%, compared with 0.00% for BFLB.

They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and Innovator.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFLB and LJUL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer