PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFLB vs. FBUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFLB vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFLB achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's 5.32% return.


BFLB

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.53%
YTD
6.52%
6M
7.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBUF

1D
-0.12%
1M
2.85%
YTD
5.32%
6M
6.28%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFLB vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between BFLB and FBUF is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.91

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFLB vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFLB

FBUF
FBUF Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFLB vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BFLB vs. FBUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFLBFBUFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.71

1.47

+0.24

Drawdowns

BFLB vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum FBUF drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and FBUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFLBFBUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.14%

-11.09%

+5.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.22%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-1.38%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

Volatility

BFLB vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFLBFBUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.76%

7.49%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.76%

9.55%

-1.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

9.55%

-1.79%

BFLB vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFLB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFLB vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison

BFLB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM20252024
BFLB
BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
FBUF
Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF
0.63%0.64%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, BFLB and FBUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, FBUF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBUF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFLB.

FBUF has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for BFLB.

They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFLB and 0.48% for FBUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFLB and FBUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer