BFLB vs. APXM
BFLB (BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF) and APXM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BFLB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for APXM.
Performance
BFLB vs. APXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFLB achieves a 5.47% return, which is significantly higher than APXM's 1.85% return.
BFLB
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- YTD
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 4.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APXM
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFLB vs. APXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFLB BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF | 5.47% | 1.82% |
APXM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April | 1.85% | 1.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFLB and APXM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.74 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFLB vs. APXM — Risk / Return Rank
BFLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
APXM
BFLB vs. APXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - April (APXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BFLB | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.03 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 7.65 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 47.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BFLB vs. APXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, which is greater than APXM's maximum drawdown of -0.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and APXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFLB | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -0.60% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.33% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -0.05% | -0.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.10% | — |
Volatility
BFLB vs. APXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFLB | APXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.74% | 1.22% | +6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 1.36% | +6.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.74% | 1.36% | +6.38% |
BFLB vs. APXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFLB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than APXM's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFLB vs. APXM - Dividend Comparison
Neither BFLB nor APXM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
BFLB and APXM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BFLB is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BFLB is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for APXM.
BFLB and APXM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFLB and 0.85% for APXM.
Find the right allocation for BFLB and APXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer