BFLB vs. PQAP
BFLB (BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BFLB charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.
Performance
BFLB vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFLB achieves a 6.52% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 12.09% return.
BFLB
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- YTD
- 6.52%
- 6M
- 7.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PQAP
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 12.09%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- 1Y
- 21.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BFLB vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BFLB BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF | 6.52% | 1.73% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 12.09% | 2.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between BFLB and PQAP is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.88 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BFLB vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank
BFLB
PQAP
BFLB vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF (BFLB) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFLB | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.86 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.71 | 1.76 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
BFLB vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFLB drawdown since its inception was -5.14%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFLB and PQAP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFLB | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.14% | -10.79% | +5.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.12% | +0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.77% | -0.60% | -0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.25% | — |
Volatility
BFLB vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BFLB | PQAP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.02% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.76% | 4.45% | +3.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 11.03% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.76% | 11.03% | -3.27% |
BFLB vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFLB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
BFLB vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison
BFLB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BFLB BufferLABS US Equity Dynamic Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April | 0.02% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BFLB and PQAP have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFLB.
PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for BFLB.
They also come from different issuers: BufferLABS and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFLB and 0.50% for PQAP.
Find the right allocation for BFLB and PQAP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer