BFJA vs. KNG

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

BFJA (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January) and KNG (FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BFJA is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while KNG is a Dividend fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. BFJA is actively managed, while KNG is passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. BFJA charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for KNG.

Performance

BFJA vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BFJA

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.52%
• 6M: -15.18%
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KNG

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.10%
• 6M: 2.32%
• YTD: 6.78%
• 1Y: 10.88%
• 3Y*: 6.99%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFJA vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	-13.10%
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	4.19%

Correlation

The correlation between BFJA and KNG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2026	0.09

Return for Risk

BFJA vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFJA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

KNG

KNG Risk / Return Rank: 32
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 32
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFJA vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January (BFJA) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BFJA	KNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.04	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.18	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.27	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	3.18	—

Drawdowns

BFJA vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFJA drawdown since its inception was -16.74%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFJA and KNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	BFJA	KNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.74%	-35.12%	+18.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.61%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.24%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.18%	-2.56%	-12.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-4.11%	-5.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.43%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BFJA	KNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.88%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.46%	10.57%	+3.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.46%	13.61%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.46%	17.13%	-2.67%

BFJA vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFJA has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

BFJA vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

BFJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.35%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BFJA FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy Floor15 ETF - January	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KNG FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF	8.35%	8.61%	9.08%	5.91%	4.00%	3.45%	3.62%	4.09%	3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BFJA and KNG in my portfolio?

BFJA and KNG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BFJA or KNG?

On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BFJA or KNG?

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BFJA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BFJA or KNG?

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.35%, compared with 0.00% for BFJA.

What is the main difference between BFJA and KNG?

BFJA is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for BFJA and 0.75% for KNG.