PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BFEB vs. SPHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BFEB vs. SPHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a 8.25% return, which is significantly lower than SPHB's 30.36% return.


BFEB

1D
-0.29%
1M
2.99%
YTD
8.25%
6M
9.24%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
16.68%
5Y*
11.70%
10Y*

SPHB

1D
-0.67%
1M
12.37%
YTD
30.36%
6M
31.36%
1Y
69.40%
3Y*
29.63%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
18.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BFEB vs. SPHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
8.25%12.99%17.58%22.35%-6.76%18.05%10.17%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
30.36%32.87%8.48%33.28%-20.59%40.58%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between BFEB and SPHB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2020

0.81

The correlation between BFEB and SPHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

BFEB vs. SPHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BFEB
SPHB

Technology

36.2%
45.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
12.5%

Communication Services

10.9%
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
12.9%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.9%

Industrials

8.1%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
0.6%

Energy

3.5%
2.2%

Utilities

2.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.8%
4.6%

Technology

BFEB
36.2%
SPHB
45.8%

Financial Services

BFEB
11.9%
SPHB
12.5%

Communication Services

BFEB
10.9%
SPHB
3.7%

Consumer Cyclical

BFEB
10.1%
SPHB
12.9%

Healthcare

BFEB
8.4%
SPHB
2.9%

Industrials

BFEB
8.1%
SPHB
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

BFEB
4.9%
SPHB
0.6%

Energy

BFEB
3.5%
SPHB
2.2%

Utilities

BFEB
2.3%
SPHB
3.2%

Real Estate

BFEB
1.9%
SPHB

-

Basic Materials

BFEB
1.8%
SPHB
4.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BFEB vs. SPHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BFEB
BFEB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
BFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
BFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHB
SPHB Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SPHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHB Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHB Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BFEB vs. SPHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BFEBSPHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.50

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.32

6.52

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.95

25.92

-8.97

BFEB vs. SPHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BFEB Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the SPHB Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BFEB and SPHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BFEBSPHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.63

3.16

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

0.56

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.90

0.53

+0.37

Drawdowns

BFEB vs. SPHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum SPHB drawdown of -46.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and SPHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BFEBSPHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.37%

-46.84%

+20.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.41%

-10.70%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.82%

-29.21%

+15.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.84%

-31.49%

+16.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.67%

+0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.69%

-8.50%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

2.69%

-1.44%

Volatility

BFEB vs. SPHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 1.51%, while Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF (SPHB) has a volatility of 7.14%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BFEBSPHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

7.14%

-5.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.31%

16.99%

-10.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

22.16%

-14.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.39%

27.38%

-15.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.19%

28.45%

-14.26%

BFEB vs. SPHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHB's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

BFEB vs. SPHB - Dividend Comparison

BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BFEB
Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHB
Invesco S&P 500® High Beta ETF
0.52%0.60%0.80%0.73%0.72%0.91%1.90%1.26%1.96%1.34%0.93%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


BFEB and SPHB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPHB has higher volatility (7.14%) compared to BFEB (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BFEB dropped -26.37% vs SPHB's -46.84%.

On 5-year performance, SPHB leads with 15.19% vs 11.70% for BFEB. On fees, SPHB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, BFEB has been the lower-risk option at 1.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPHB has performed better with a 15.19% return vs 11.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPHB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for BFEB.

SPHB has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for BFEB.

BFEB is categorized as Options Trading, while SPHB is S&P 500. BFEB tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series, while SPHB tracks S&P 500 High Beta Index. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for BFEB and 0.25% for SPHB.

SPHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BFEB and SPHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer