BFEB vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
BFEB and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. BFEB is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index February Series. It was launched on Jan 31, 2020. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both BFEB and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
BFEB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BFEB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | -1.98% | 12.99% | 17.58% | 22.35% | -6.76% | 18.05% | 10.17% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 17.51% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BFEB achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.
BFEB
- 1D
- 2.08%
- 1M
- -3.52%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 14.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.25%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BFEB vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
BFEB has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BFEB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
BFEB
VOO
BFEB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BFEB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.50 | +0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.23 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.53 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.76 | 7.29 | +1.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BFEB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | 0.98 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.70 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between BFEB and VOO is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BFEB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
BFEB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BFEB Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
BFEB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BFEB drawdown since its inception was -26.37%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BFEB and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BFEB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.37% | -33.99% | +7.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.20% | -11.98% | +2.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.84% | -24.52% | +9.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -6.29% | +1.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -3.72% | +0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | 2.52% | -0.76% |
Volatility
BFEB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P 500 Buffer ETF - February (BFEB) is 3.97%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that BFEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BFEB | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 5.29% | -1.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.48% | 9.44% | -2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 18.10% | -4.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.40% | 16.82% | -5.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 17.99% | -3.66% |