PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BF-B vs. KMB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BF-B vs. KMB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BF-B achieves a 3.17% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, BF-B has underperformed KMB with an annualized return of -2.27%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.37% annualized return.


BF-B

1D
3.24%
1M
-0.86%
6M
1.84%
YTD
3.17%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
-25.46%
5Y*
-16.48%
10Y*
-2.27%
ALL TIME*
12.70%

KMB

1D
0.12%
1M
5.77%
6M
12.09%
YTD
10.35%
1Y
-10.77%
3Y*
-3.71%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
1.37%
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BF-B vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
3.17%-29.29%-32.23%-11.91%-8.86%-6.07%18.67%43.78%-10.98%55.01%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
10.35%-19.86%11.79%-7.08%-1.58%9.66%0.95%24.57%-2.06%9.04%

Correlation

The correlation between BF-B and KMB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984

0.35

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BF-B:

$12.32B

KMB:

$36.01B

EPS

BF-B:

$1.71

KMB:

$5.93

PE Ratio

BF-B:

15.47

KMB:

18.30

PEG Ratio

BF-B:

19.23

KMB:

3.16

PS Ratio

BF-B:

3.19

KMB:

2.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

BF-B:

$3.91B

KMB:

$16.54B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BF-B:

$2.32B

KMB:

$5.93B

EBITDA (TTM)

BF-B:

$1.19B

KMB:

$3.07B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BF-B vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BF-B
BF-B Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BF-B Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BF-B Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
BF-B Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
BF-B Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
BF-B Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

KMB
KMB Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
KMB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMB Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
KMB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMB Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BF-B vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BF-BKMBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.95

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.22

-0.37

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.47

-0.54

+0.07

BF-B vs. KMB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BF-B Sharpe Ratio is -0.14, which is higher than the KMB Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BF-B and KMB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BF-B vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BF-B drawdown since its inception was -68.96%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BF-B and KMB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BF-BKMBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.96%

-36.97%

-31.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.48%

-29.60%

+4.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-65.65%

-34.06%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.31%

-34.06%

-34.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.96%

-34.06%

-34.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.73%

-22.08%

-41.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.73%

-8.88%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.83%

20.10%

-8.27%

Volatility

BF-B vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison

Brown-Forman Corporation (BF-B) has a higher volatility of 11.36% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.95%. This indicates that BF-B's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BF-BKMBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.36%

8.95%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

31.77%

18.53%

+13.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.77%

27.01%

+11.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.26%

20.57%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.20%

21.23%

+6.97%

Dividends

BF-B vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison

BF-B's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, less than KMB's 4.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BF-B
Brown-Forman Corporation
3.48%3.49%2.32%1.46%1.17%2.37%0.88%0.99%3.10%1.09%1.54%1.29%
KMB
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
4.68%5.00%3.72%3.88%3.42%3.19%3.17%3.00%3.51%3.22%3.22%2.77%

Financials

BF-B vs. KMB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brown-Forman Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.06B
4.16B
(BF-B) Total Revenue
(KMB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BF-B vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brown-Forman Corporation and Kimberly-Clark Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
60.6%
36.9%
Portfolio components
BF-B - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a gross profit of 640.00M and revenue of 1.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.6%.

KMB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.

BF-B - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported an operating income of 343.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.5%.

KMB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.

BF-B - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Brown-Forman Corporation reported a net income of 267.00M and revenue of 1.06B, resulting in a net margin of 25.3%.

KMB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BF-B and KMB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BF-B has higher volatility (11.36%) compared to KMB (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BF-B dropped -68.96% vs KMB's -36.97%.

BF-B currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BF-B and KMB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer