BETZ vs. WNTR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

BETZ (Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BETZ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming Index, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. BETZ is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, BETZ returned -15.03% vs 120.64% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.27, they often move in opposite directions. BETZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

BETZ vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BETZ achieves a -6.53% return, which is significantly lower than WNTR's 10.13% return.

BETZ

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: -2.63%
• 6M: -3.30%
• YTD: -6.53%
• 1Y: -15.03%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: -6.09%
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 1.92%
• 1M: 18.08%
• 6M: 14.43%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 1Y: 120.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BETZ vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	-6.53%	12.03%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	10.13%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between BETZ and WNTR is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.27

Return for Risk

BETZ vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BETZ

BETZ Risk / Return Rank: 4
BETZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BETZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Omega Ratio Rank: 4
BETZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BETZ Martin Ratio Rank: 5

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 70
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 72
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BETZ vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BETZ	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.73	2.26	-2.99
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.93	2.47	-3.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.90	1.34	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	2.84	-3.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.82	7.31	-8.13

BETZ vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BETZ Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BETZ and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BETZ vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BETZ drawdown since its inception was -60.82%, which is greater than WNTR's maximum drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BETZ and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	BETZ	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.82%	-42.65%	-18.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.20%	-42.65%	+13.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.77%	-10.15%	-26.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-33.86%	-20.53%	-13.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.27%	16.58%	+1.69%

Volatility

BETZ vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF (BETZ) is 5.69%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 18.84%. This indicates that BETZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BETZ	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	18.84%	-13.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.74%	47.46%	-30.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.76%	53.83%	-33.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.99%	53.56%	-26.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.88%	53.56%	-25.68%

BETZ vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

BETZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

BETZ vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

BETZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BETZ Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF	4.89%	4.57%	0.86%	0.00%	0.66%	0.00%	0.28%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.14%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BETZ and WNTR in my portfolio?

BETZ and WNTR have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BETZ or WNTR?

WNTR has higher volatility (18.84%) compared to BETZ (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BETZ dropped -60.82% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, BETZ or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 120.64% vs -15.03% for BETZ. On fees, BETZ is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, BETZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BETZ or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 120.64% return vs -15.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BETZ or WNTR?

BETZ is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BETZ or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 4.89% for BETZ.

What is the main difference between BETZ and WNTR?

BETZ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill Investments and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for BETZ and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.